Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone else been mistakenly identified for a

> pensioners-only heart throb?



Am no where near pension age but think DT is v lovely... can see how it would take slightly dodgy eyesight to mistake you for him though :-P

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone else been mistakenly identified for a

> pensioners-only heart throb?


Pensioner only - are you kidding?? Loooove David Tennant and am a long way off pension age (given how things are with annuity values going probably getting further away by the day!)


However, I think you might need the eye sight of a pensioner to confuse you. (And I don't mean that in the insulting way it could be read)

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The biddies in Scotmid used to cry "language

> Timothy!" at me as I packed their messages. Not

> sure that Corbett was really heart throb material,

> though.


Ah I really love that. Messages.


"But WHAT messages" they cried. You know, JUST messages, I replied.


Cheers Ted.

David tennants spotted RED APPLE on lordship lane today.

I spoke to it and it said it was staying in dulwich for a couple of days.

I advise yoghurt to go there and eat for yourself.


ps Tall avian mangle soiling faulty and fake gods on lordship loin

Same. Not heard that for years....I used to get old Mrs Stuart her messages every Wednesday from Dunlops van.



katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ted Max Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The biddies in Scotmid used to cry "language

> > Timothy!" at me as I packed their messages. Not

> > sure that Corbett was really heart throb

> material,

> > though.

>

> Ah I really love that. Messages.

>

> "But WHAT messages" they cried. You know, JUST

> messages, I replied.

>

> Cheers Ted.

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> However, I think you might need the eye sight of a

> pensioner to confuse you. (And I don't mean that

> in the insulting way it could be read)


Yeah MrBen, you're a handsome chap and all, but blimey, David Tennant? You wish.


I have loved that man since he was an irascible singing cop with bad teeth in Blackpool (they all have bad teeth in Blackpool), and even now he has fallen from grace and is doing that terrible comedy quiz show thing, I STILL LOVE HIM, and I am here to tell you that he is a bona fide heart throb, and I WILL FIGHT ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...