Jump to content

trendy to disabled was said by east dulwich mother in east dulwich sport center on wednesday swim


Recommended Posts

Do you mean "trendy to BE disabled"?


Why so upset? It was probably a clumsy way of saying that following the paralympics disability was getting more positive press than ever before. A good thing.


Nothing to see here.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has this thread been put through an auto

> translate?


http://emotloader.hu/emoticons/happy/Content_8%20-%20emotloader.hu.gif

well i myself am a male nurse and could not belive what was said i see lots of things at work but this was the worst

she had 2 children and did not realy care if people hear her chatting to her friends , not good at all is this the sort of people that live in our friendly east dulwich

celtic1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well i myself am a male nurse and could not

> belive what was said i see lots of things at work

> but this was the worst

> she had 2 children and did not realy care if

> people hear her chatting to her friends , not

> good at all is this the sort of people that live

> in our friendly east dulwich


To re-state Otta:


'Do you mean "trendy to BE disabled"?


Why so upset? It was probably a clumsy way of saying that following the paralympics disability was getting more positive press than ever before. A good thing.


Nothing to see here.'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...