Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James Barber, the driving force behind change of use of hospital to school, always said the Chateau front would be saved. I agree, it would be a real shame if it was bulldozed.


In terms of the much smaller, modern health centre site ( half of which is now a GP practice) does anyone know when the hospital/community health element of this will actually be operational? One would have thought that in the middle of a pandemic this service would be rather important. It seems a number of promised services are not yet up and working.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James Barber, the driving force behind change of

> use of hospital to school, always said the Chateau

> front would be saved. I agree, it would be a real

> shame if it was bulldozed.


To be accurate Mr Barber was the driving force behind getting an unwanted primary school approved for the site, the catchment area for which, rather bizarrely, would have been towards Nunhead.


A whole load of unravelling was required by committed parents? groups, councillors and the then MP, Tessa Jowell, to sort that one out so that the more appropriate secondary school, in terms of local need for our community, was built there instead.


As far as I am aware it has always been the plan to retain at least the facade of the ?chateau? former main entrance structure.

Hi dc,

I was the driving force for the following schools:

- Harries Academy East Dulwich Primary School

- The Charter East Dulwich school idea and obtaining the site. Originally fought tooth and nail by the Labour council. The council officer in charge at the time literally said "over my dead guilt in East Dulwich.


I assisted:

- Belham school application

- proposing the site for the Judith Kerr Primary School

- Advice and putting SE1 parent campaign in touch with Haberdasher's resulting in Haberdashers' Aske's Borough Academy


For brief time the Hospital site was proposed to also house a primary school when it was unclear the NHS would build any health replacement facility on the site.


I believe you know this dc but you have a party political axe to grind.

Back on topic - the central 'villa' section of the hospital will be retained, and will become the school's library etc. The large buildings with the domes will all be demolished. Demolition was due to start at the end of term, slightly surprised the bulldozers aren't already at work.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi dc,

> I believe you know this dc but you have a party

> political axe to grind.


Honestly, my political axes are ground out having worked for Tessa Jowell for 23 years until 2015 when she stood down as the local MP. I was speaking about the specific case of the hospital site and I?m sure you might understand that I?m not hugely keen to have my former boss written out of the history of that particular story. Especially when the record shows me to be telling the truth:


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1407450,page=1


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,1405452,1408612#msg-1408612

siousxiesue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sad to see the herb garden has been destroyed,

> wonder if any attempt was made to relocate or at

> least off the plants to people.



Oh no!


We ran a benefit gig to raise money for that little community garden, back in the day.


What a shame. I thought they had been promised that it would be kept.

I remember trying to see what could be done to get this listed, but sadly this isn?t any history that Dulwich wants to preserve. The site was a poorhouse, hospital, maternity hospital, and a lot could have been done to preserve the buildings and conserve the architectural fabric and repurpose it for use today. Sadly, like many things in this country, unless the object has value in an elitist version of history, it won?t be preserved. No matter the cost. Parliament is not for purpose, but billions will be spent on it.


The social history of the site is remarkable and worth preserving and included in the history lessons of local schools. There is plenty of reference to Dulwich, the art gallery, school, even Ruskin, but the fact that a poor house was on the site of the school should be important to talk about too. Poverty and deprivation are just as present today, but more concealed.


In any case, sad to see the garden go as well, I didn?t have much hope for it seeing how the developers were moving this past winter.


Charter East is another academy and the catchment is again very elite and just like charter north. Schools they are, but in the end, not true public schools, or the state schools up the road.


Also, no freaking clue why it is named after an MP whose record was riddled with controversy. Had to explain to a young person why the name of the stop changed and couldn?t bring myself to explain the erasure of a perfectly serviceable and historical name for the sake of memorialising a questionable figure. What do I say, a woman who was an MP whose claim to fame was the olympics, more gambling venues for the already poor, and Child centre program that barely lasted 10-15 years. A new labour acolyte. Profit above all. The history of this site could be a great example of how the next generation will be living the consequences of the greed and vanity of the past 40 years. Maybe I will start talking about the name change.


Who knows, it might be a poor house again considering the way things are going.

It is a beautiful building and I'm glad the chalet will form part of the school. Firstly, full transparency: I'm a parent of a child at the school - part of the founding cohort. I just wanted to gently point out that under the Tories, no new school can open that isn't an academy or a free school so that would be the case of any new state school. The local parents who fought for the school had no choice. In terms of charges of the school being elitist, according to the last Ofsted report of Charter ED:


- Pupils come from diverse backgrounds and the proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is much higher than average. (just over half students come from BAME backgrounds)

- The proportion of pupils eligible to receive free school meals at any time in the last six

years is much higher than average. (I believe the last stat I heard was 36%?)

- The proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care plan is broadly

average. More pupils than average are in receipt of SEN school support.


Many local children benefit from the school including children who go to the local Goose Green Primary School (a vibrant and diverse school) and also children who live in the nearby East Dulwich Council Estate. It's very different from the private schools just up the road... with their coaches bussing in children from all over London.


In terms of the physic garden the parent led eco volunteers group which has been led by parents spent alot of time to keep up the garden with monthly volunteer sessions open to all. Sadly, they found out a a few months ago the builders needed that piece of land.... not sure why and yes, parent volunteers were disappointed at this outcome. The volunteers spent a day salvaging what they could about a month ago and relocating what they could.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi dc,

> I was the driving force for the following

> schools:

> - Harries Academy East Dulwich Primary School

> - The Charter East Dulwich school idea and

> obtaining the site. Originally fought tooth and

> nail by the Labour council. The council officer in

> charge at the time literally said "over my dead

> guilt in East Dulwich.

>

> I assisted:

> - Belham school application

> - proposing the site for the Judith Kerr Primary

> School

> - Advice and putting SE1 parent campaign in touch

> with Haberdasher's resulting in Haberdashers'

> Aske's Borough Academy

>

> For brief time the Hospital site was proposed to

> also house a primary school when it was unclear

> the NHS would build any health replacement

> facility on the site.

>

> I believe you know this dc but you have a party

> political axe to grind.


You also wanted it to be a Haberdashers school rather than Charter.

Hi, do you know what sort of appointments and what services are currently being offered? This is meant to be a community resource and under the current circumstances there may be value in having it open sooner rather than later. It certainly should not just be a private GP practice.
FM: It?s an NHS GP practice, albeit run by a private company, but all GP practices are privately owned. I also have to have a blood test next week and will be going there for it. Why don?t you pop along there and see which parts are open and report back to us instead of being so negative about a great new facility?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...