Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rebs_ED Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If roads like Derwent Grove are made

> effectively

> > dead ends - what do things like the bin lorries

> > do? Or delivery vans?

>

>

> same as they do for Cul de Sacs (the posh name for

> dead ends)


cul de sacs often have turning circles, don't they? - no where for a bin lorry to turn in a narrow straight road.

Rebs_ED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Rebs_ED Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > If roads like Derwent Grove are made

> > effectively

> > > dead ends - what do things like the bin

> lorries

> > > do? Or delivery vans?

> >

> >

> > same as they do for Cul de Sacs (the posh name

> for

> > dead ends)

>

> cul de sacs often have turning circles, don't

> they? - no where for a bin lorry to turn in a

> narrow straight road.


They will have to reverse the length of the roads after collecting the bins and then reverse out of the roads onto either Lordship Lane or East Dulwich Grove depending on which end the barriers are. Isn't that going to force them to perform an illegal driving maneuver of reversing onto busy roads? Also they can't be too pleased with having to reverse down the length of a road. Surely the council would need to do some sort of risk assessment?

To be fair, Derwent Grove is likely to be the most problematic in terms of turning.


At least with Elsie you could reverse half way down then use the junction with Tintagel to turn; and do something similar with Jarvis Road on Melbourne. Just to add, I don?t drive, and I?m not advocating these as safe manoeuvres, but I?m assuming this is what delivery vans etc would end up doing. Of course, in both cases, it involves using what is basically the entrance to a school (Charter ED and Goose Green) respectively as your turning circle, which is less than ideal for all sorts of reasons.


Out of interest, can anyone who is in favour of these closures please articulate to me why they are necessary? I walk down all four roads regularly and far from being rat runs, other than at school drop off and pick up on Elsie and Melbourne, they are in fact very quiet. Indeed, it is unusual for more than one vehicle to drive past in the entire time it takes me to walk down each street.


I can see the merit of school streets on Melbourne, Tintagel and to a lesser extent Elsie. However, other than forcing every single car owning resident of each of these streets; their delivery vans; their tradesmen etc onto EDG, what exactly are these changes hoping to achieve? I cannot help but think that in circumstances where the junction of EDG and Lordship Lane is already saturated and dangerous, heaping more cars onto it 24/7 is wholly disproportionate.

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rebs_ED Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JohnL Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Rebs_ED Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > If roads like Derwent Grove are made

> > > effectively

> > > > dead ends - what do things like the bin

> > lorries

> > > > do? Or delivery vans?

> > >

> > >

> > > same as they do for Cul de Sacs (the posh

> name

> > for

> > > dead ends)

> >

> > cul de sacs often have turning circles, don't

> > they? - no where for a bin lorry to turn in a

> > narrow straight road.

>

> They will have to reverse the length of the roads

> after collecting the bins and then reverse out of

> the roads onto either Lordship Lane or East

> Dulwich Grove depending on which end the barriers

> are. Isn't that going to force them to perform an

> illegal driving maneuver of reversing onto busy

> roads? Also they can't be too pleased with having

> to reverse down the length of a road. Surely the

> council would need to do some sort of risk

> assessment?


Rockets - Just to clarify, the plan is to put the barriers at the Grove Vale end of each of these streets. I am assuming that this is to address the argument I (and no doubt others) made to the Goose Green councillors when this scheme was initially pitched, which is that the scheme would end up worsening air pollution on Grove Vale running past Goose Green school. The NO2 levels outside Goose Green school have previously been assessed as in breach of government and WHO guidelines (although I?m conscious the school has worked hard with green screen initiatives to try and mitigate this).


In practice however, even in Summer without school traffic, the Goose Green roundabout is already struggling to cope with the increased burden caused by road closures elsewhere, so much so that I?ve witnessed it at a standstill more than once. There is therefore in my view a very high probability that come Autumn, the combined impact of all these closures will cause queues of idling traffic outside Goose Green school, in circumstances where they did not exist previously.

"Out of interest, can anyone who is in favour of these closures please articulate to me why they are necessary?"


The dream is to make car ownership so unattractive that everyone sells their cars and takes chances with coronavirus on a local bus instead.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Out of interest, can anyone who is in favour of

> these closures please articulate to me why they

> are necessary?"

>

> The dream is to make car ownership so unattractive

> that everyone sells their cars and takes chances

> with coronavirus on a local bus instead.


And if cars are so despised who can you sell them to.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Out of interest, can anyone who is in favour of

> these closures please articulate to me why they

> are necessary?"

>

> The dream is to make car ownership so unattractive

> that everyone sells their cars and takes chances

> with coronavirus on a local bus instead.


I totally get that this is no doubt Southwark?s aim

BUT unlike Court Lane and Calton Avenue these are very very short roads intersecting two main A roads, in close proximity to the station and the main shopping thoroughfare on Lordship Lane. Those residents who are able to do so no doubt walk journeys in the immediate vicinity already (anyone who knows this area well will know that parking is somewhat nightmarish, so I very much doubt the residents of these roads are regularly driving the 5 minutes to the station or M&S). For those wanting to undertake longer journeys/ who need to use their cars for whatever reason, blocking one end simply gives the residents the option of driving out the other end, which at most will increase their journey by 10 minutes. I just don?t understand how these measures will change behaviours. For those residents driving their kids to the local private schools, closing the Grove Vale end will make little difference as they were almost certainly going to be driving down EDG to do so anyway.


I totally get why you might want to implement school street closures on some of these roads, but anything beyond that seems to me to have everything to do with nimbyism and very little to do with active travel or attempting to reduce air pollution. With that in mind, I find the enthusiasm with which the Goose Green councillors supported this proposal to be completely bewildering.

Serena2012 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rockets Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Rebs_ED Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > JohnL Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Rebs_ED Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > If roads like Derwent Grove are made

> > > > effectively

> > > > > dead ends - what do things like the bin

> > > lorries

> > > > > do? Or delivery vans?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > same as they do for Cul de Sacs (the posh

> > name

> > > for

> > > > dead ends)

> > >

> > > cul de sacs often have turning circles, don't

> > > they? - no where for a bin lorry to turn in a

> > > narrow straight road.

> >

> > They will have to reverse the length of the

> roads

> > after collecting the bins and then reverse out

> of

> > the roads onto either Lordship Lane or East

> > Dulwich Grove depending on which end the

> barriers

> > are. Isn't that going to force them to perform

> an

> > illegal driving maneuver of reversing onto busy

> > roads? Also they can't be too pleased with

> having

> > to reverse down the length of a road. Surely

> the

> > council would need to do some sort of risk

> > assessment?

>

> Rockets - Just to clarify, the plan is to put the

> barriers at the Grove Vale end of each of these

> streets. I am assuming that this is to address the

> argument I (and no doubt others) made to the Goose

> Green councillors when this scheme was initially

> pitched, which is that the scheme would end up

> worsening air pollution on Grove Vale running past

> Goose Green school. The NO2 levels outside Goose

> Green school have previously been assessed as in

> breach of government and WHO guidelines (although

> I?m conscious the school has worked hard with

> green screen initiatives to try and mitigate

> this).

>

> In practice however, even in Summer without school

> traffic, the Goose Green roundabout is already

> struggling to cope with the increased burden

> caused by road closures elsewhere, so much so that

> I?ve witnessed it at a standstill more than once.

> There is therefore in my view a very high

> probability that come Autumn, the combined impact

> of all these closures will cause queues of idling

> traffic outside Goose Green school, in

> circumstances where they did not exist previously.


So the bin lorries will need to reverse out onto East Dulwich Grove from each of the closed streets. Are they even permitted to do that - surely there an HSE person in the council having nightmares about that!

It's more likely the bin lorries will reverse into the closed streets.


I've seen one doing this regularly at the junction of Lynton Road and Chaucer Drive in Bermondsey (which is a closed road with an actual cycle route on it).


The bin men act as banksman and give right of way to cyclists as the guide the lorry down the road backwards

Metallic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hell awaits us wherever we live in SE22 and SE21.

> Do these councillors think they will be returned

> at the next election? Maybe they don't care.



Sadly, we're in one of the safest Labour seats in the country which is why they have the front to do these things while also holding consultations that they completely ignore the outcome of.

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Metallic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hell awaits us wherever we live in SE22 and

> SE21.

> > Do these councillors think they will be

> returned

> > at the next election? Maybe they don't care.

>

>

> Sadly, we're in one of the safest Labour seats in

> the country which is why they have the front to do

> these things while also holding consultations that

> they completely ignore the outcome of.


Their vote will be split by independents. In my view anyway.

Has anyone set up a petition yet? I can see that residents in Wandsworth have done one for the same reason on Change.org


Just found this on the Turney/Burgage Road Residents website- so please contact James Barber on here if you have experienced anything unsafe?


No doubt school children being chucked out of cars a mile away from schools as there is no longer anywhere to drop them safely will cause problems in a couple of weeks...


'The interventions are under the Emergency Traffic Act and can last up to 18 months and if they are to be made permanent a consultation process has to be carried out. Any intervention can be removed sooner if it is clear that it is unsafe.

Wil72 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'The interventions are under the Emergency Traffic

> Act and can last up to 18 months and if they are

> to be made permanent a consultation process has to

> be carried out. Any intervention can be removed

> sooner if it is clear that it is unsafe.


This government are getting rid of "red tape" like that - I'd double check it's not gone in one of the bills this year as boris doesn't do "consultation".

There isn't a petition set up yet, but if someone does then post details here and also make sure it covers the restrictions borough wide so as to include Peckham, Camberwell and the Walwortb road changes as you would get more signatures.


Sadly if I started it as Spartacus it would lead to a slave revolution !

andrewc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here is a recent study on the effect of school

> street closures.

>

>

> https://www.napier.ac.uk/about-us/news/school-stre

> et-closures



I have to confess that I am supportive of school streets, which are in any event, not 24/7 closures, 365 days a year. However, what Southwark are implementing here goes way beyond school streets. Not least as many of the roads standing to benefit including, Burbage Road, the section of Turney proposed for closure, Calton Avenue, Court Lane, Melbourne South and Derwent Grove have no schools on them. In fact, it is clear that many of their proposals will worsen the air quality at the area?s schools.

andrewc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Studies indicate that on average, over-all traffic

> reduces by 11% (with a road closure). Is there any

> evidence that this drop in car use would not be a

> benefit to all local streets in terms of air

> quality?

You know that research is 18 years old. Stop quoting it. A drop of even 11% leaves 89% plus displaced traffic from elsewhere.

Sorry for mix up.


Roads in SE21/SE22 are not school streets.


And also,


"On the nature, scale and coverage of the evidence

 We located 16 studies, all of which had not been peer reviewed although one was a Masters

dissertation

 The locations covered by the studies included Camden, Edinburgh, Solihull, Perth and

Kinross, East Lothian, Croydon, Southampton, and the region of Flanders, Belgium."


and Southwark creeps in extra to the "study"


"Supplementation of evidence by interview

The use of semi-structured interviews was an additional element to the project, not originally

planned at the bid submission stage. This was added, with approval of the funder, after it became

clear that the literature on SSCs was limited. The intention was to augment Council reports on SSCs

with up-to-date (as of March/April 2020) perspectives and access to newer evidence via direct

contact with local authority officers working on SSCs.

Requests were made in February and March for interviews by phone. Ten remote interview requests

were made and five interviews undertaken. Interviews were recorded for note taking purposes only

and subsequently destroyed. One recording failed to work and notes of that discussion relied solely

on notes taken. The Topic Guide with questions is provided in Annex 1. Interviewee names are not

reported. The local authorities participating were:

 London Borough of Camden

 London Borough of Croydon

 London Borough of Southwark

 Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

 Southampton City Council."


Edinburgh study:

A key lesson learned from the pilots was the need for infrastructure provision: ensuring peripheral

streets can accommodate displaced traffic movements,..."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...