Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Evening all...

Any ideas how to stop people from driving down the middle of the local roads so they can try and straddle the multiple speed cushions that are around?


Roads that used to comfortably accomodate 2 cars travelling in opposite directions now become a game of chicken with drivers pulling out and accelerating to try and get their wheels either side of the bumps.


Its dangerous and bloody annoying.


(The only amusing note is that its far better for your suspension to take the bumps head on, (what with it being designed to go up and down,) rather than try and straddle them, which forces the wheels into a position theyre not designed to be in.)

nothing you can do. i don't understand why they don't just make full bumps across the full breadth of the road, it won't be because of cost - the edging of 3x separate bumps takes time.

it is a wind-up where (as you say) a road where you could usually pass an oncoming car gets blocked because the oncoming cars insist on straddling the bumps, they avoid going over with their right-hand side !!

breathe deep....

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Drive an old car and stand your ground.



From his moniker I guess Panda Boy is a cop - maybe even a black rat - so that is probably not an option!


Think the gaps in the sleeping policemen are to allow fire appliances to sail through un-bumped - am most probably wrong though! (s I am sure someone will come steaming in to tell me....).

It's also worth noting that straddling the humps in a normal car can, given the poor construction of the humps, cut and damage the inner and unseen walls of tyres. This makes them more likely to suffer a blow out, which at speed can easily result in a major traffic accident.

> From his moniker I guess Panda Boy is a cop -


Nope, not a cop! (Good guess though.) If I was i'd probably be able to pull people over and explain to them that accelerating down the middle of the road in a built up area isn't really a very good idea.


Just royally p*ssed at the way some people drive round here; selfish, dangerous and just downright bloody rude.


Think the humps, and more like them are here to stay unfortunately so its down to us to adapt to them.


(Now i'm annoyed that the mods have moved this thread to the lounge after I posted it in the general section. Obviously the sighting of a hedgehog in a garden, or an incredibly tedious bad pun filled thread about tomato sauce are more worthy topics in the general section than trying to highlight bad driving habits in the local area. Thanks mods, nice one, still waiting for an explaination for this by the way...?)

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't cross the mod this isn't a democratic site

> you know!


I know I know, just a little confused as to what the mods see as general discussion and lounge material. Obviously terrible puns are more worthy than quesioning local road safety...


(Mods - still waiting for an explaination by the way?)

Pb, wasn't me who moved your post but just so you know we don't automatically know you're talking about us - the mind-reading lizards thing is just a rumour ;-)


Try reporting your message so it's seen by the whole team and I'm sure someone will let you know. Otherwise you'll have to wait until the person who moved it happens to read this thread again.


Just a guess, but it may be that Admin scanned the titles and thought it seemed non-ED specific.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maybe because this isnt a specifically E Dulwich

> Issue?


Fair point, but I intended it to be a specific ED issue, as I posted it on the ED forum and used the phrase 'local roads'. But I shall be even more explicit in future.


Have emailed the mods, waiting for a response...

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe it's been moved here because the mods feel

> you should worry about more important things?


More important things than tons of metal and glass playing chicken on residential roads?

Really?

I would hope dangerously bad local driving habits would be taken more seriously.


If the level of important things has tomato sauce puns and hedgehog sightings near the top, then i'm clearly expecting far too much from this forum.

(Not anti hedgehogs by the way, love the little buggers!)


And thanks Family Room Moderator, will take your advice. Not trying to kick up a stink, just ken to know their reasoning.

panda boy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Maybe it's been moved here because the mods

> feel

> > you should worry about more important things?

>

> More important things than tons of metal and glass

> playing chicken on residential roads?

> Really?

> I would hope dangerously bad local driving habits

> would be taken more seriously.

>

> If the level of important things has tomato sauce

> puns and hedgehog sightings near the top, then i'm

> clearly expecting far too much from this forum.

> (Not anti hedgehogs by the way, love the little

> buggers!)

>

> And thanks Family Room Moderator, will take your

> advice. Not trying to kick up a stink, just ken

> to know their reasoning.



Speed bumps are irritating but they're not dangerous. Nothing to get het up about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...