Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Please could any of you point me in the right direction? My lo has outgrown his infant car seat (maxi cosi) and we need to buy a new one. Any recommendations would be greatly received as well as any local (ish) places to go to for shopping and advice.

I really dont want to drag ds to john lewis so any tips would be great.

Thank you so much


CX

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26526-best-car-seat-for-9-mnths/
Share on other sites

the maxi cosi priory (called priorfix if you get the isofix version) scores highest in the which? ratings as the next stage up car seat with a traditional 5 point harness.


The german 'kiddy' range of carseats which have a safety bar instead of traditional harness also score very highly, in fact they come out on top, but we bought one and had horrendous problems, our toddler literally fell out of it several times while we were on the motorway - we had fitted it correctly - and after some rather dubious and lengthy interaction with kiddy it emerged that this is a fairly common problem, that and older children being able to push the bar out.


if you google it you find lots of reviews from parents who have turned round to find their baby in the foot well or standing up on the seat. Kiddy told me that they are working to rectify the safety issue by designing a special insert to try to keep children in the seat in these instances.

I spoke to John Lewis about this (we obviously had to return their seat) they were shocked that Kiddy were trying to supply an insert to make their seats safe secretly through their customer services in Germany, and only when parents contacted them highlighting the safety issue, and yet as one of the leading suppliers of the seats they had been told nothing about the safety issues and the insert, and it was not available in stores)

When I sent Kiddy a final email imploring them to make the safety risk with their seats public before a child is seriously injured or worse, their correspondence with me abruptly stopped, as I knew it would, because they simply cant afford to acknowledge such an email. I found 2 other parent reviews on line where they said that Kiddy were willing to correspond with them and acknowledge the safety issues they were finding with their seats right up until they urged them to make it public and then Kiddy stopped replying....I have a couple of friends with kiddy seats who love them and have not experienced any problems, but personally I would not want to take the gamble and my advice would be to steer well clear

Hi,

Thats intesting to know HS. We have a 16 month old who has just had a growth spurt and we are now popping out of the top of our Cybex Aton 0+. We were hoping to get a rear facing next stage, but it won't fit in our ford focus (or it would, but I driver wouldn't!!). We were going to go for the Kiddy seat and have seen two types of reviews - either (1) brilliant, brillant - best by far - much better than 5 points and (2) the same as your post!

Think we are probably going to go ahead with the Kiddy and see what happens on a few test drives (the 16 month old is a strong wriggler though so am worried).

MID - we went to Peppermint on Northcote Road and they were really helpful. There's also somewhere in Petts Wood I think, but I haven't been.

x

We have an isofix kiddy pro for our now 3.5 yr old - we got it a year ago when he started breaking out of his 5 point harness. It's been good for him but I did try our younger son in it at a few months ago at about 14m and he didn't manage at all well - started slipping down in the seat as HS describes! I thought it was because it wasn't really set up right for him but maybe just not great for the younger ones - it is very upright. It is much better for older toddlers and it will last us hopefully. Youngest has been in a second stage rear facing seat since 10m which has been great.

we've got a britax evolva, really sturdy, lasts through group 1,2 and 3. was in which best buy review

got it from precious little one, online baby retailer, cheaper than john lewis, next day delivery


http://www.preciouslittleone.com/products/38/group-1-2-3&pageNum_rsCategoryProducts=1&totalRows_rsCategoryProducts=85/

We had a rear facing seat for my youngest from 9 months to over 3, she's still in it now but forward facing at 4 years.


It's been brilliant - came from the place in Petts Wood, they couldn't have been more helpful. You do need to book an appointment for advice & fitting, there is parking outside (pay & display).


Do at least look at www.rearfacing.co.uk. It isn't for everyone but personally keeping my youngest rear facing til gone 3 was no issue at all & gave me peace of mind especially on longer journeys.

Another big fan of rear-facing, we have the Britax Two Way Elite in our Golf, goes behind the passenger seat and fits fine but we are a small family. Son loves it and actually hated being forward facing on holiday this year. We bought ours from the excellent In Car Safety Centre in Milton Keynes.


A dad friend asked me why we keep E rear-facing at the weekend - I gave him a few reasons whilst not being preachy but his comment 'don't you think it's unfair to him' made me giggle as it reminded me of this hilarious (and informative) blog post:


http://1000reasonsimabadmom.com/reason-137-i-bore-my-toddler-to-death/


Our son is definitely not suffering psychologically from facing backwards!! Wish there was more information out there about this issue, we are so behind other countries.

We went rear facing (check out http://rearfacing.co.uk/).


We chose the Britax 2 Way Elite (http://www.incarsafetycentre.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/30/products_id/46), because our car had passenger footwell storage which make the models with a supporting leg unsuitable. We've been really pleased with them and our twin boys are still using them. The boys are tall, but we only turned them to forward facing at 3.5 years old, and they were really happy facing backwards (even though they're quite tall).


We bought ours from the In Car Safety Centre as the Petts Wood shop didn't stock this model at the time. I can thoroughly recommend the Petts Wood people though - they were really happy to help, even though they couldn't provide what we needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...