Jump to content

The Mag on LL


nonold

Recommended Posts

It hasn't actually closed, has it? Isn't it just open rather erratic hours at the moment?


We had our last http://www.thegooseisout.com Singaround there the other Sunday (9th) before moving to The Old Nun's Head.


To the best of my knowledge somebody else is buying it, or at least was in the process of doing so a few weeks ago.


He also posted on here about it a while ago.


ETA: The originator of this thread, in fact!

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Turn it into an indoor market downstairs. Upstairs small theatre. Above that workshops. Large out building turned into studios for all forms of artists. Then the old beer garden turned into the public entrance and evergreen wonder garden for all who know about it. Worth a punt.
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mark Dodds posted this on the Cherry Tree thread

> (29 October):

>

> "Someone above recommended to Chris and Antonia

> that the Magdala/Magnolia is for sale and they

> ought to take that on. That is an action NoT To BE

> Recommended: It's an Enterprise Inns tied lease.

> Any more info wanted about this toxic kind of

> leasehold - message me or ask Jamie at the

> Palmerston. They bought their freehold from

> Enterprise and have a lot of experience of that

> company's behaviour."

>

> ETA: I don't know how to link to a single post, or

> even if it's possible to do that, but it's on this

> page:

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?3

> 0,987030


This thread is from some time ago. The lease of the Magdala / Patch whatever will no doubt be on the market again soon, unless Enterprise Inns sell the freehold for alternative use or maybe decide to try to lease it direct to Tesco or some other gigaco nobody would want in the area. The pub would be completely viable if it were not in the clutches of a vampire blood sucking corporate criminal scam lease company but otherwise anyone taking it on again will be knackered some years down the line, now that a serious amount of investment has been put into the building there's a chance that someone will take it on and last a bit longer than the most recent sorry incumbents who've lost more than their shirt on it... I did warn them, I offered support, they didn't take it up...


Enterprise Inns did their stuff. I warned people off this toxic lease and doing business with this vile company, I predicted it. I don't get any pleasure from being a clairvoyant. It's not difficult to predict this stuff really - I've done it on every pub in the area for the last twenty years and no one has taken a blind bit of notice.


Anyway. Here is the sign of 'Peaceable Reentry'.

I just noticed - Enterprise are NOT the freeholder they are the head leaseholder. They were subletting to the Patch people... This is not uncommon. Don't know who the freehold is owned by. Does anyone in this forum know?


The pub has a massive amount of potential freehold or even possibly free of tie if the rent isn't insane.

Buy it ? 1000 people investing ?1000 each = Buy freehold ? Property will never lose its value:

Investors currently getting 0.5% in the bank ? Go for PLC and issues shares ? Or cheaper shares with more holders: Cost a few hundred for a solicitor to help sent-up a PLC.

It might be an interesting test for the recent much trumpeted change in the law re tied tenancies (tho I confess I don't know the details nor even whether it's already in force). If it does what it's supposed to do it will at least allow someone to try and make a viable independent business there. However I have a nasty suspicion that the recent demise of the Patch will be said to be evidence that it's not a viable site and there'll be an application to convert to residential

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

However I have a nasty suspicion that the

> recent demise of the Patch will be said to be

> evidence that it's not a viable site and there'll

> be an application to convert to residential



It just needs somebody there who knows what they are doing ..... The Great Exhibition and The Actress could have been said not to be "viable sites", as could The Ivy House, and they all seem to be doing fine .....

The law doesn't come into effect until after going through third reading in the Lords, next February and it will apply only to tied leases that are running - new leases are not affected.


Enterprise are disposing assets to pay interest on debts so they may sell the head lease on for a premium.

Sue, as for 'It just needs somebody there who knows what they are doing' It'e certain that the people who set up the Patch thought they knew what they were doing however irrespective of that the point, seriously, is that the Magdala site is TIED and the pubs you mention above are now all free of tie. That makes a massive difference.


Plus when it comes to 'they all seem to be doing fine' - they only 'seem' so after hundreds of thousands of quids' worth of investment and 'seem' is the operative word. Three years from now the 'fine' situation may be very different.

Sue...

As I understand it The Ivy House is listed as an Asset of Community Value..

It is the only pub in the area and therefore of a benefit to the local community

as well as the excellent entertainment promoted by yourself Nygel and others.


The Magnolia Patch certainly isn't . It has no Historic value.

It has a vast level of competition and as a pub has failed over the past 10 years.


I cannot remember when it was last a 'destination' for want of a better word.


It would never be able to compete with the EDT as a Pub or the now well established Palmerston as a Restaurant.


It is always sad to loose another pub with 31 pubs closing every week


source :- http://www.camra.org.uk/protecting-and-saving-pubs


However I find it difficult to come up with an alternative enterprise for the site.

Even housing does not seem practical.


DulwichFox

Long discussion here on why The Patch probably failed:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1411045


Fox, The Ivy House is far from being "the only pub in the area" - The Waverley Arms in Ivydale Road is within a stone's throw, for a start :)


Its listing as an asset of community value was to prevent it being turned into flats before money could be raised by the community to buy it, not because there were no other nearby pubs.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought the Waverley Arms had only just reopened

> after a refit ???

>

> There are a couple of pubs on Nunhead Lane. Only

> one worth travelling too.

>



Yes the Waverley Arms has had a refit, not quite sure what point you are making? It was open before, when The Ivy House reopened, and now it's open again :)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Im not trying to make a point.

>

> I made a positive comment about the Ivy House and

> the good work you and Nygel and others have done

>

> and I still get grief...

>

> Foxy




Eh? I'm not giving you grief, I just don't understand why you said the Ivy House was the only pub in the area, as if that explained its success?


Never mind, maybe it's just me being thick, quite likely.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...