Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks PGC, sounds like I might be needing that!


*adopts stern expression number three (one that's really quite scary and not in a good way)*


Now listen here boys. Enough of this smut!

I will absolutely not be dressing up for the forum gathering.

Shocking, what would Dulwichmum think?

I'm not inclined to be too hard on Anthony. All he was doing was giving his group a little of the

old hustle, sounds to me as though he's being entrepreneurial in a Del Boy sort of way.

Shame on you Annaj for dobbing him in.


I feel kindly inclined towards the lad.

I'm inclined to condemn Anthony's actions in the strongest possible terms. He's trying to gull

innocent forum members into attending one of nhis group's shows by means of the basest sort of subterfuge.

This simply won't do. It's the absolute giddy limit. the man is the worst sort of bounder.

Well done Annaj for exposing this chancer.


Choking on my own rage here.

HonaloochieB, I have no idea what is going on in your head, but the efficiency of your post really appeals to me - making both sides of the argument yourself so we don't have to waste any time. Well done.


I really don't mind at all if Anthony wants to promote his band, but I dislike sneakiness. If he wants to tells us all that they're great that's fine, I might even give them a listen, but he should be honest about it.

He's been strangely quiet though since his first (and last?) post.


Anthony? Are you there?

I'm with annaj on this one. I like it that people can come on here & promote their band/pub/shop/cat/whatever, but I can't stand people being dishonest about it.


If you got a band tell us when you're playing in the "What's On" area. Don't try to pull the wool over our eyes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...