Jump to content

Recommended Posts

saw chery ghost 2-3 years ago at bush hall, was a great set, took me weeks to find out about him as there was nowt much on t'internet at time.


today listenin to different versions of Omie Wise by :

Bert Jansch

Bob Dylan

Doc & Merle Watson

Doug Wallin

G. B. Grayson


it's cool to collect loads of versions and play em in one run..

The new School of Seven Bells album.

They seem to have moved away from the sound that was so hard to pin down in their debut and are wearing their influences a little self-consciously, but then touching points of Stereolab, My Bloody Valentine and the Cocteau Twins are happily fizzing my bung-holes, so thumbs up (just up, not up anything in particular after that last metaphor) from me.

Speaking of I Am Kloot, Mercury shortlist. This award has become a bit of a joke and it is completely unpredictable, but anyone like to hazard a guess from this lot?


Biffy Clyro with ?Only Revolutions?

Corinne Bailey Rae with ?The Sea?

Dizzee Rascal with ?Tongue N? Cheek?

Kit Downes Trio with ?Golden?

Foals with ?Total Life Forever?

I Am Kloot with ?Sky At Night?

Laura Marling with ?I Speak Because I Can?

Mumford And Sons with ?Sigh No More?

Paul Weller with ?Wake Up The Nation?

Villagers with ?Becoming A Jackal?

Wild Beasts with ?Two Dancers?

The XX with ?XX?

Danger Mouse and Sparklehorse - Dark Night of the Soul: very good

The National - High Violet: not sure yet, starting to think it's a bit dirgey for my liking

Arcade Fire - The Suburbs: enjoying it more with each listen

The Drums: very enjoyable

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...