Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is the broadcasting of the results of the prank call to the humiliation of the victim that is bullying, the prank call was made to be broadcast, the DJs made the call, therefore, they are bullies.


That the broadcast would become a worldwide phenomena was inevitable, that the humiliation would thus be magnified many times was forseeable.


They were unable to gain permission for broadcast, yet the broadcast was made. Promotion of the broadcast continued after it should have been taken down. Its a 24 hour radio station, time difference is no excuse.


I am not saying that the DJs are wholly responsible for the suicide, but they may have contributed to the suicide.


The DJs misery may well be heart felt, but that doesnt absolve them of some responsibility. This should be investigated and if they are found to be partially responsible, they should answer for that.

But the DJs wouldn't have made the decision to broadcast or not broadcast. Point your anger at the radio station if that's how you feel, but I think you are putting it all on these 2 people who were basically just larking about in typical crap radio fashion, as is their job.


Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Shattered AND Gutted"


You seem to have missed "heartbroken" but I suspect that was deliberate.



> Lets save our concern and sympathy for the family

> of Jacintha Saldanha.



I hadn't realised sympathy had to be exclusively used on one or the other parties. Of course everyone would sympathise with the family (the DJs included). But I feel sory for these 2 who are no doubt feeling pretty shitty over the whole thing.

I think you are being unreasonable MP. You know nothing about these two DJs on a personal level. The shock and remorse they are showing is genuine. Compare that to the behaviour of Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand when they made a prank call that backfired.


As they said in their public statement, they expected to be hung up on pretty sharpish, and given no precedent to the thousands of prank calls radio stations have made day in and day out over the years, thought nothing beyond entertainment value in making it. If they thought for one moment that a tragic outcome was a possibility, they would never have made it.

They are adults, albeit heartbroken adults, and so are answerable for their actions.


"We were only obeying orders" was discredited as a defence after 1945.


Of course the management of the radio station have something to answer for too.


As the public voice/face of the radio station the now heartbroken DJs were happy to bathe in the warm glow of their notoriety, until it all went horribly wrong. They are not the innocent victims of management. They were at best complicit in the decison making that led to the prank call and the broadcast being made.


Ironically, in an era of blame culture and mob mentality. The ED mob seems to want to wrap these two idiots up in cotton wool and protect them from the implications of their actions.

Is it bullying if two hapless Australian DJs at the centre of a would-be-harmless=prank-gone-tragically-wrong are pursued and vilified across the globe - in print, on screen - and (of course) on internet forums?


I suspect this probably fits the definition better.



What if one of them is driven to suicide? What if, what if..

References to the Nazis in the context of this conversation are wholly uncalled for!


I agree with Bob. I am unfortunate enough to know someone who has committed suicide and have a few friends / family who have been suicidal at different points in their lives. Your ideas about a very complex mental health issue are far too simplistic. Again, anything can tip a suicidal person over the edge. Your idea of justice would require us to investigate and arrest scores of people every time a suicide occurred, particularly as you are including events that are only the straw pushing someone over the edge.

What *bob* said. MP your posts seem full of genuine vitriol towards these 2 chumps who you've never met. I remember hearing a prank call years ago when a DJ (I think it was on Radio City, which is Liverpool's answer to Capital) called the Eiffel Tower and asked about admission prices and opening hours, before asking whether there was fencing around the top, he went on to basically tell the receptionist that he was planning to throw himself from the top of the tower.


I remember thinking this was a pretty funny call, and in all honestly, had I heard the call we're all getting so upset about now (I haven't so much as heard a clip yet) and there were barking "corgis" in the background, I'd have thought it was pretty funny. Stupid but funny.


Then someone kills themself, and suddenly it wasn't all that funny after all. But basically they could never have predicted this, and Marmora Man's earlier comparrsion to an arsonist starting a fatal fire just doesn't work for me. Arson is still a serious crime commited by a nutter whether there is a death or not. Making a prank call may be immature and stupid, but there was nothing psychotic about it.


What they should have done, and probably wish they had done was to have ended the call themselves when it was clear they were getting further than they'd expected, but hindsight is a wonderful thing.


At the end of the day, it was a joke! A really crap joke, but a joke nonetheless. Should it have been broadcast? Well not the bit that revealed ANYTHING about the state of the patient, but the bit that showed the hospital up as being a bit crap, well why not? Lots of businesses get tested by undercover shoppers and if they fail to act professionally, this gets exposed.





At the end of all that a woman killed herself. That is undoubtedly the real tradgedy in all of this. Why did she do it? NO ONE KNOWS!


Are the DJs secretly loving all this? It's possible, I'll give you that.


Are the DJs absolutely shocked about what has happened, and wish they could rewind time and not make / air the call? I think that is more likely.


Either way, are the DJs responsible for this woman's death? NO.

Good point BJL re: the Royal Family and being awestruck.


I'm with *bob* too.....and with londonmix as well. Suicide is a complex issue, like LM I too have a good understanding of depression and related issues. Unfortunately the level of general understanding in society is poor and there are many things that can exacerbate the feelings of a severely depressed person just on a day to day level. It's very easy when someone tragically takes their life to look for a single determining trigger, but the reality is that there are many triggers, underpinned by the depressive illness itself.


I am inclined to ask more about the friends, family and colleagues around her on a day to day basis. And if she felt that she couldn't seek help or confide in anyone then we should be asking why. Underneath that is a whole debate to be had about the difficulties and stigma of coping with mental health issues in this country.

Otta, to be fair my vitriol is not actually at the DJs, although I think they have a question or two to answer but so does the radio management and the hospital management.


I feel that we live in an increasingly polarised society that on the one hand sees ambulance chasing Solicitors making money from an increasingly litigious culture and on the other hand a tendency to wany to avoid jeopardy for the results of behaviour gone wrong.


Maybe the two are connected?


Society, I think, has rather glorified trivia and trivialisation. Media figures act without an expectation that they will be held account, thus a list of alleged paedophiles can be brandished at the Prime Minister by a minor TV celebrity without any thought that actually, this might be a bad idea. I enjoy Twitter as much as the next voyeur, but some of the participants forget (or ignore) that their tweets that slyly imply are potentially very damaging to individuals.


This all adds to a view that popular public figures can act with impunity, say what they want with little concern for the results on often innocent third parties.


As for all the other commenst, yes I too have been close to suicide. It is always complex, those that remain are left with a sense of guilt that never really goes away (and that sense of anger and betrayal and more guilt because you feel angry at and betrayed by the person that killed themselves) and so it goes.


Finally,


What reference to World War 2? I stated that that particular defence was discredited at a paticular point in time, I didnt imply anything else.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it bullying if two hapless Australian DJs at the centre of a would-be-harmless=prank-gone-tragically-wrong

> are pursued and vilified across the globe - in print, on screen - and (of course) on internet forums?

>

> I suspect this probably fits the definition better.

>

> What if one of them is driven to suicide? What if, what if..


Quite, *Bob*. Having been around this forum for a few years now, so I'm a bit surprised at some of MP's postings on this thread. I know who I think is coming across as the bully here and it ain't the two hapless DJ's.

Voyageur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bullying? Hardly. He talks a lot of sense.


Would you still have that opinion if you knew that the two DJ's read this forum? Go back and read his posts, imagining you are one of the DJs. How would you feel?

There's no suggestion from me that MP is ordinarily anything but a righteous dude on most occasions. I just disagree on this one.


I simply point-out that if bullying is defined as aggressive, repetitive behaviour with the intention of making people suffer, then the collective voices of millions of people calling for two people's head on a platter trumps a one-off, brief encounter which - whatever the tragic result - never intended anything but a lighthearted bit of fun.

It is interesting, "it was just a bit of fun" can be used to justify behaviour that others might find unacceptable.


Particularly if they are on the receiving end.


Particularly if that statement is followed by "you have no sense of humour" or "are you frigid?" or even, "are you a lesbian?" or similar.


Followed by much chapish laughter.


Followed by a profound and corrosive sense of hopelessness on the part of the recipient.


Bullying does not have to be loud and aggressive, it is in some ways worse when it is wrapped up as light hearted banter that surely no right thinking person could possibly be upset by?

You confuse justification with intent, when they are not the same.


This 'type of behaviour' has been acceptable, sanctioned - and part of mainstream media for nearly a century, with hardly the bat of an eyelid. But I don't think you'll see it any more.


As with so many things, one tragic incident will have have influence far beyond what is necessary or reasoned.

If you're telling me that there is - in your mind - no possibility of pranking and hoaxing - tricks played on members of the general public without malicious intent - 'ever' being acceptable (from Orson Welles, through Candid Camera to Jeremy Beadle) then I find that hard that hard to believe.


But if that's where you're at, then fair enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...