Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In modern day society many choose not to get married.

Some even refuse to committ to living together.

Having no personal objections to this myself (I'm a firm believer in having my own space) I do however have difficulties in understanding why it is more socially acceptable for men, say from the 30+ age range, to be carefree, single (with many "acquaintances") and generally simply a "bachelor" compared to the today "spinster". Again, I stress Why?


N.B. the today "bachelor" to mean unmarried men who do not have and are not actively seeking a spouse or other personal partner and "spinster" to mean a woman or girl of marriageable age who has never been married maybe for the same reasons

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2721-spinster-v-bacholer/
Share on other sites

Hehehe....google image search gives the following:


Bachelor



Spinster:

http://www.takeourword.com/images/spinster.jpg


Maybe it's becaus secretly all men want to sleep around and be foot-loose and fancy free - they think they still have "it" no matter how old they are and therefore could have any women of their choosing. Most are more Bernard Manning than George Clooney however.


Whilst women are all desperate to get married and settle down to a life of shackled marital bliss. If this doesn't happen by 30 they turn into the above picture overnight.


Admin - can you re-size the top photo so he's not so goddamn scary with those perfect teeth and dreamy blue eyes!


* no probs, took an artistic licence to make him a bit tubbier though *

Why? We're not in Italy are we? In English a nubile is a marriageable woman or a sexually attractive woman and celibe or a celebate is someone who doesn't have sex and I'm sure KK isn't suggesting that because some of us who might be single go without.

This goes back to the old age arguement - one incidentally that I've always found ridiculous - that if a man sleeps around he's a man of the world but if a woman does the same she's a slag.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why? We're not in Italy are we? In English a

> nubile is a marriageable woman or a sexually

> attractive woman and celibe or a celebate is

> someone who doesn't have sex and I'm sure KK isn't

> suggesting that because some of us who might be

> single go without.


I felt that as the English words were so unfair to women then perhaps we could get a bit of balance by using the Italian!

Or queer. Or faggot.


Other than borrowing from Italy, what better suggestion do you have for those of the female gender who decide of their own free will to remain single but may occasionally shag some bloke if they've drunk enough Lambrini on a night out! ;-)

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Other than borrowing from Italy, what better

> suggestion do you have for those of the female

> gender who decide of their own free will to remain

> single but may occasionally shag some bloke if

> they've drunk enough Lambrini on a night out! ;-)


I think the term you're looking for is a goer.

er, it could be that actually most 'spinsters' as described by you are desperately seeking mr right, in a Bridget Jones type way, whereas most bachelors as described by you are having the Life of Riley, however I suspect that you and the PC world of EDF will call me a mysoginist git for suggesting that there is evean a miniscule grain of truth in my analysis...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...