Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I understand from Dulwich OnView that each library was allocated 200 tickets and could hand out up to 4 tickets per person, so they were bound to go quickly. There are some libraries which weren't open today and will therefore hand out their allocation tomorrow, of which Grove Vale Library is one I believe.


All of the tickets at Dulwich Library had gone by 9am when my son's childminder turned up after the school run.

I understand the Shard are only giving out 4,000 tickets to Southwark residents, and for January only.

I don't know how many libraries there are in Southwark but if they're only giving out to the first fifty (say times four tickets), howcome only 200 tickets to one library. There's aren't THAT many libraries left in Southwark are there?


(Too ill to do the maths...)

bloonoo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy you can argue that people who go to work

> can afford the entry price, whereas those who

> don't (single parents, people on benefits etc)

> can't, therefore they deserve free tickets more.


I knew somebody would come up with some such sanctimonious bollocks. I was fishing for it in a way, I suppose.

There are 12 libraries in Southwark. The ED librarian told me that more tickets were allocated to those nearer the Shard so presumably ED got the fewest (200). Some are closed on Wednesdays so you might get lucky tomorrow if you're keen enough to travel on the offchance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Saw this today about Southwark voting in support of a tourist tax in the borough  BBC News - Tourist tax visitor levy comes closer in Southwark https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ypvw0qln7o Makes me wonder what else they can find to tax, maybe a fine for breaking wind, or breathing or even a tax on windows. Of course I am being facetious but it does feel like if it moves, they will tax it. 
    • Politicians particularly so....remember it's always party before people! I doubt McAsh will be in cabinet much longer...he might find even more attempts to kneecap his political career. I wonder if he might have to move to another area and restart - he obviously has political ambition but it seems Southwark is not going to be where it blossoms anymore - unless he can manage some sort of coup.  
    • You could attend the next edf drinks    https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/360548-ed-forum-drinks/page/3/#comments
    • Hi Sue, they were not local solicitors. Andrea’s was based in Wales and the other firms involved were large nationwide conveyancing companies (rather than conventional high street solicitors). I’m happy to advise clients and buyers privately on what I believe to be their shortcomings but I don’t think doing so in public on the forum would be appropriate, particularly as they are not locally based. My general advice would always be to steer clear of the big conveyancing companies as they are, in my experience, notoriously difficult to contact when the need arises and the case handler is often not a fully qualified solicitor and so issues have to be referred upwards to “technical teams” internally, which was part of the problem in Andrea’s chain. Tony
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...