Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was there on my beloved terraces when opposition fans (not every team, and I wont name them) chanted "nigger nigger lick my boots" (I am quoting, so will use the term), and 100s of bananas were thrown onto the pitch. It was wrong, even so a different world when Shoot magazine had an article on the lack of black players, and blamed mental attitude. Oh how they were proved wrong.


I recall 15 years later monkey chants close to a ground at a black bus driver.


Now all changed, including the attitude both of fans and the authorities and thankfully society as a whole. You can be a lanky b'tard, fat b'stard, bald b'stard but not a b'tard of any particular ethnicity when being insulted from the terraces. OK so these may be offensive terms, but in the manner of JT offensive, not racist. And I heard a great story, Millwall fans taunting Marlon King, a man who has a bit of a dodgy past - "you're just a black Jimmmy Savile". And a couple start discussing, questioning whether they are being racist or not (how times have changed). I think this is another JT outcome.


So my question dear reader is how far does zero tolerance go. If someone is being racist, do you say please disist from being racist my dear man (or madam), this is 2012 not 1912. Or do you go straight to the stewards, get them kicked out and banned for life (which will happen).


Not a loaded question, just interested in views as I came across this almost first hand the other day. Don't go to FIFA 13 as that wont give you an answer.


Depending on the results tomorrow I'll tell a story from New Years Day 1979.

I think there has to be zero tolerance but it's hard to find the right way to deal with that at ground level when Fifa do such a poor job at the top (eg punishing a player for wearing he wrong endorsed kit more than a club that subjected an England U21 team to racism during a qualifier match).

Should have titled this racism in football crowds of course. Think there is a fine divide between changing someone's behaviour as opposed to the sledge hammer approach. The twot at the Chelsea Man U league cup match does amuse me though, "I am so so sorry for doing the monkey impression, please please don't ban me for life"


The thread was based on a couple of real experiences, but as one was second hand don't know how objectionable the person was - yes stewards were brought in and yes no doubt he will get a banning order.

  • 1 month later...

Two things: A Millwall fan who directed racist abuse at a Leeds United striker has been banned from football matches for five years and ordered to pay more than ?500. Gerrard Scanlon, 53, was arrested after Sky Sports News broadcast footage that appeared to show some of the London club's supporters abusing El Hadji Diouf. Scanlon, a delivery driver, admitted his foul-mouthed tirade when he was brought before magistrates on Wednesday and fined ?425. He was told to pay further costs of ?85 and a ?15 victim surcharge, the Metropolitan police said.


And the incident at the Emirates that kicked off my thread, where someone was abusing one of the empty seats (red, fat and empty); I jest of course, he was abusing the players. This bloke has been done as well.

Excellent documentary on ITV last night (I don't usually use excellent and ITV in the same sentence) on Laurie Cunningham. First saw him when he was at Orient, who were about the only team who regularly had black players. Sadly a wasted career after too many injuries at Real Madrid.


Shame there is not more footage, particularly in Madrid, and that BBC could not have shared some of their's.


www.itv.com/itvplayer/first-among-equals-the-laurie-cunningham-story/series-1/episode-1-first-among-equals-the-laurie-cunningham-story

  • 3 weeks later...

I've read and listened a little about the chanting at the recent England matches, particularly that aimed at the Ferdinands. There are denials of course but I have a lot of time for some of the people on Radio 5. Here they reported that there was more tension than normal at the San Marino match and some faces from the past were seen, who thought they could get round their banning orders.


The other thing 5 live reported was the chanting of 'No surrender (to the IRA)' a chant a recall from 20 years ago which I found extremely ignorant.


Now I want my national team to do well, but I really can't stand the jingoism/ fuex nationalism you get (and that bloody Sheffield Wednesday band). A mate went to an England match against Wales a year or so ago and got fed up with the Sheep Shagger stuff aimed at the sheep shaggers, sorry the Welsh.


I was in Cologne during the Germany world cup which was brilliant, until the atmosphere took a tumble in advance of England fans arriving.


Sorry I've digressed from racist chanting to my issues with English support as a whole.

I've just read in the paper that one of the racist chants was the 'bonfire song'. I had to Google this. Whilst I can understand that singing a rather unpleasant song about the two Ferdinands can be seen to have racist undertones, the song itself seems difficult to define as racist. I'd guess that anyone banned for racism for singing this would have a legal case.


(For those, like me, who don't know it, try http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/27/rio-ferdinand-chants_n_2961699.html)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...