Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Chimpanzee adenovirus vector" does not mean "Chimpanzee cells".


And a cell line originating from a single aborted fetus (many years ago) does not mean that your vaccine contains bits of unborn baby.


I wonder if admin could remove this thread, perhaps?

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Chimpanzee adenovirus vector" does not mean

> "Chimpanzee cells".

>

> And a cell line originating from a single aborted

> fetus (many years ago) does not mean that your

> vaccine contains bits of unborn baby.

>

> I wonder if admin could remove this thread,

> perhaps?

It is listed as what it contains, surely it should say how it is made instead, either way, some people may object to taking something made in this way

Don't forget Smallpox was beaten by a cow virus - Cowpox.


"How the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine works

The ChAdOx1 vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in chimpanzees. ChAdOx1 was chosen as the most suitable vaccine technology for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as it has been shown to generate a strong immune response from one dose in other vaccines. It has been genetically changed so that it is impossible for it to grow in humans. This also makes it safer to give to children, the elderly and anyone with a pre-existing condition such as diabetes. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors are a very well-studied vaccine type, having been used safely in thousands of subjects."


https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-07-19-the-oxford-covid-19-vaccine

If it is so Safe and effective, why is it necessary for UK Gov to give the Pharma companies legal indemnity

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html



JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't forget Smallpox was beaten by a cow virus -

> Cowpox.

>

> "How the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine works

> The ChAdOx1 vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus

> vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened

> adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in

> chimpanzees. ChAdOx1 was chosen as the most

> suitable vaccine technology for a SARS-CoV-2

> vaccine as it has been shown to generate a strong

> immune response from one dose in other vaccines.

> It has been genetically changed so that it is

> impossible for it to grow in humans. This also

> makes it safer to give to children, the elderly

> and anyone with a pre-existing condition such as

> diabetes. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors are a very

> well-studied vaccine type, having been used safely

> in thousands of subjects."

>

> https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-07-19-t

> he-oxford-covid-19-vaccine

UK and others countries have a "No Fault compensation scheme" for all vaccines so companies making the vaccine don't get sued - not just Covid


This article suggests the sum paid should be increased for COVID but the point is that indemnity for the company developing the vaccine is common for all vaccines.


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00065-7/fulltext

uplandrd2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is listed as what it contains, surely it should

> say how it is made instead, either way, some

> people may object to taking something made in this

> way


Thank you for modifying your original post, and no longer claiming the virus contains cells from chimpanzees and human fetuses.


Yes I am sure you are right, some people may object to potentially millions of lives being saved using this technology. Some people object to all sorts of things. Some people are idiots.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uplandrd2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It is listed as what it contains, surely it

> should

> > say how it is made instead, either way, some

> > people may object to taking something made in

> this

> > way

>

> Thank you for modifying your original post, and no

> longer claiming the virus contains cells from

> chimpanzees and human fetuses.

>

> Yes I am sure you are right, some people may

> object to potentially millions of lives being

> saved using this technology. Some people object to

> all sorts of things. Some people are idiots.


You are right about potentially millions as we don't have an accurate count of deaths, did they die of covid or with covid?


A Department of Health and Social Care source summed this up as: ?You could have been tested positive in February, have no symptoms, then be hit by a bus in July and you?d be recorded as a Covid death.?


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/21/analysis-why-englands-covid-19-death-toll-is-wrong-but-not-by-much

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you have to die within 28 days of catching covid

> for it to be called a covid death.

>

> ps ive reported this thread too.

Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it does not mean they died of Covid it means they died with Covid.

Someone terminally ill with another disease in a hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying with Covid

It's a real fact so not sure what you've reported this for.

The number of deaths within 28 days of testing positive for covid in the UK is quite close to the excess deaths over and above the average rate. 119K vs 116K so far. So if it has been over-counted, it is only fairly marginal.


So not only are you spreading false info about vaccines, you're also trying to play down the tragic death toll.

uplandrd2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > you have to die within 28 days of catching

> covid

> > for it to be called a covid death.

> >

> > ps ive reported this thread too.

> Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it

> does not mean they died of Covid it means they

> died with Covid.

> Someone terminally ill with another disease in a

> hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying

> with Covid

> It's a real fact so not sure what you've reported

> this for.


I reported this because you wrote that being 'hit by a bus' months after covid would qualify as a covid death. increasing our sad total further.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uplandrd2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > alice Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > you have to die within 28 days of catching

> > covid

> > > for it to be called a covid death.

> > >

> > > ps ive reported this thread too.

> > Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it

> > does not mean they died of Covid it means they

> > died with Covid.

> > Someone terminally ill with another disease in

> a

> > hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying

> > with Covid

> > It's a real fact so not sure what you've

> reported

> > this for.

>

> I reported this because you wrote that being 'hit

> by a bus' months after covid would qualify as a

> covid death. increasing our sad total further.


I did not say that, it was written in the Guardian article that I linked to. This Public Health emergency has changed our lives, all im saying is are we sure the numbers are correct.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Quick update - the Medivet reception have confirmed that the owner has been to collect this dog...!
    • I'm a patient. Over the past 9 years I have had to have more "engagement" with the Practice and believe things have significantly deteriorated.  Have you attempted to get an appointment with them?  They send patients to the Tessa Jowell Centre as "an overspill", why is is? Why can they not see patients at the practice? Why are patients required to submit photo's so they can be diagnosed. I thought the purpose of GP's was to SEE their patients, diagnose, treat and refer them if and as required to hospital. Or am I incorrect??   The practice does has some excellent staff, but the reviews show the constraints they obviously have to operate under.  The agenda they have prepared has some very interesting and topical items that are up for discussion, so a prime opportunity to ask them some searching and difficult questions they'd probably rather not be asked.  Time for some scrutiny to be applied. The practice is supposed to provide a broad range of medical services for its patients, personally I do not feel this has been or is the case. Have a read of the practices online reviews, to say the least, they make painful reading.  As an example. years ago, the doctor who had a surgery further up Forest Hill Road till he retired and FHRGP took over a lot of the patients from there, the doctor offered a walk in morning and afternoon surgery and did home visits in the evening. Why can FHRGP not operate something similar?  They have a huge building, from what I have seen, the space is inadequately used with vast amounts sitting empty, such a waste. Other local practices, I'm sure would love to be located in such a vast building.  I'd like to see much more patient involvement in how the practice operates and delivers its services to us the patients.    
    • Are you on the PPG?  They appear to want others to engage but they also acknowledge that such a group will never be fully representative of users  There is lots on line, but it was interesting to find the last inspection report of the CQC who quote a survey done my the PPG.  https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-544424476/inspection-summary
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...