Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Chimpanzee adenovirus vector" does not mean "Chimpanzee cells".


And a cell line originating from a single aborted fetus (many years ago) does not mean that your vaccine contains bits of unborn baby.


I wonder if admin could remove this thread, perhaps?

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Chimpanzee adenovirus vector" does not mean

> "Chimpanzee cells".

>

> And a cell line originating from a single aborted

> fetus (many years ago) does not mean that your

> vaccine contains bits of unborn baby.

>

> I wonder if admin could remove this thread,

> perhaps?

It is listed as what it contains, surely it should say how it is made instead, either way, some people may object to taking something made in this way

Don't forget Smallpox was beaten by a cow virus - Cowpox.


"How the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine works

The ChAdOx1 vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in chimpanzees. ChAdOx1 was chosen as the most suitable vaccine technology for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as it has been shown to generate a strong immune response from one dose in other vaccines. It has been genetically changed so that it is impossible for it to grow in humans. This also makes it safer to give to children, the elderly and anyone with a pre-existing condition such as diabetes. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors are a very well-studied vaccine type, having been used safely in thousands of subjects."


https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-07-19-the-oxford-covid-19-vaccine

If it is so Safe and effective, why is it necessary for UK Gov to give the Pharma companies legal indemnity

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html



JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't forget Smallpox was beaten by a cow virus -

> Cowpox.

>

> "How the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine works

> The ChAdOx1 vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus

> vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened

> adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in

> chimpanzees. ChAdOx1 was chosen as the most

> suitable vaccine technology for a SARS-CoV-2

> vaccine as it has been shown to generate a strong

> immune response from one dose in other vaccines.

> It has been genetically changed so that it is

> impossible for it to grow in humans. This also

> makes it safer to give to children, the elderly

> and anyone with a pre-existing condition such as

> diabetes. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors are a very

> well-studied vaccine type, having been used safely

> in thousands of subjects."

>

> https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-07-19-t

> he-oxford-covid-19-vaccine

UK and others countries have a "No Fault compensation scheme" for all vaccines so companies making the vaccine don't get sued - not just Covid


This article suggests the sum paid should be increased for COVID but the point is that indemnity for the company developing the vaccine is common for all vaccines.


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00065-7/fulltext

uplandrd2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is listed as what it contains, surely it should

> say how it is made instead, either way, some

> people may object to taking something made in this

> way


Thank you for modifying your original post, and no longer claiming the virus contains cells from chimpanzees and human fetuses.


Yes I am sure you are right, some people may object to potentially millions of lives being saved using this technology. Some people object to all sorts of things. Some people are idiots.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uplandrd2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It is listed as what it contains, surely it

> should

> > say how it is made instead, either way, some

> > people may object to taking something made in

> this

> > way

>

> Thank you for modifying your original post, and no

> longer claiming the virus contains cells from

> chimpanzees and human fetuses.

>

> Yes I am sure you are right, some people may

> object to potentially millions of lives being

> saved using this technology. Some people object to

> all sorts of things. Some people are idiots.


You are right about potentially millions as we don't have an accurate count of deaths, did they die of covid or with covid?


A Department of Health and Social Care source summed this up as: ?You could have been tested positive in February, have no symptoms, then be hit by a bus in July and you?d be recorded as a Covid death.?


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/21/analysis-why-englands-covid-19-death-toll-is-wrong-but-not-by-much

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you have to die within 28 days of catching covid

> for it to be called a covid death.

>

> ps ive reported this thread too.

Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it does not mean they died of Covid it means they died with Covid.

Someone terminally ill with another disease in a hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying with Covid

It's a real fact so not sure what you've reported this for.

The number of deaths within 28 days of testing positive for covid in the UK is quite close to the excess deaths over and above the average rate. 119K vs 116K so far. So if it has been over-counted, it is only fairly marginal.


So not only are you spreading false info about vaccines, you're also trying to play down the tragic death toll.

uplandrd2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > you have to die within 28 days of catching

> covid

> > for it to be called a covid death.

> >

> > ps ive reported this thread too.

> Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it

> does not mean they died of Covid it means they

> died with Covid.

> Someone terminally ill with another disease in a

> hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying

> with Covid

> It's a real fact so not sure what you've reported

> this for.


I reported this because you wrote that being 'hit by a bus' months after covid would qualify as a covid death. increasing our sad total further.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uplandrd2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > alice Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > you have to die within 28 days of catching

> > covid

> > > for it to be called a covid death.

> > >

> > > ps ive reported this thread too.

> > Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it

> > does not mean they died of Covid it means they

> > died with Covid.

> > Someone terminally ill with another disease in

> a

> > hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying

> > with Covid

> > It's a real fact so not sure what you've

> reported

> > this for.

>

> I reported this because you wrote that being 'hit

> by a bus' months after covid would qualify as a

> covid death. increasing our sad total further.


I did not say that, it was written in the Guardian article that I linked to. This Public Health emergency has changed our lives, all im saying is are we sure the numbers are correct.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...