Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would pay extra for meat that had been reared in a pleasant and stress free natural environment and slaughtered in as 'humane' a way as possible. I must admit I am verging on veggie as if I think about the animal that I am eating and how it has probably died my appetite disappears. I wouldn't expect others to share my views though.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605323
Share on other sites

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> civilservant Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Voyageur Wrote:

> > > I wouldn't expect others to share my views

> > though.

> >

> > I seem to share your views exactly, on all

> counts!

>

>

> I share both your views!



That's good to hear. I guess part of the point is though that I don't expect others to agree or to change their own views - my partner is a confirmed carnivore and is not concerned re provenance. I am happy to live and let live.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605378
Share on other sites

To all who share Voyageur's views, take a look at this:


http://www.soilassociation.org/whatisorganic/organicanimals


I take it when most people hear the word 'organic' they think of food with less pesticides/chemicals/additives etc. The fact that organic livestock are raised with more space, more natural food, superior outdoor access, more space per animal etc. seems less commonly known!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605457
Share on other sites

Hi James


I think it's useful to point out that the first part of the Soil Association's strap line is healthy soil. A bit obvious, perhaps, but really important given that the organic approach to food production is based on sustainability. See this link for info about the serious soil degradation problem the planet faces:


http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2012/04/12/why-soil-matters/


Apart from that, organic food just tastes better, in my view, anyway.


Alec

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605478
Share on other sites

"The fact that organic livestock are raised with more space, more natural food, superior outdoor access, more space per animal etc. seems less commonly known!"


....but obviously those conditions for raising livestock are not unique to farms that have gone to the trouble of being certified organic. My problem with organic food is that the process of certification implicitly draws a bright line between "good" and "bad" when the reality is less clear (for me at least). For example, the Soil Association promotes the use of homeopathic remedies for livestock, which kind of undermines their credibility.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605539
Share on other sites

Homeopathy for farm animals... whatever next, I thought? Reiki for sheep? Acupuncture for cows? Then I looked it up - and all this stuff actually already exists.


Anyway, I generally avoid organic stuff, because I don't want to pay the extra price, and I am cynical about the benefits.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605554
Share on other sites

It's much better but has limitations.


I don't beleive it is suistainable for everyone to eat organic, in the same guise however I think that over production of processed, chemically enriched, irradiated, preserved food is not the answer either.


I eat organic where I can but generally go for the in season, grow together goes together approach.


One thing is for sure summer fruits are for summer or I aint going near them.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605595
Share on other sites

Well, recent research suggests that there really aren't any significant nutritional benefits for organic produce. Regarding safety, both organic and non-organic produce have pesticide residues below current safety standards but if you believe current safety standards aren't robust enough then I can see why you'd go for organic. While organic farms are more environmentally friendly per unit of land, they actually use more energy etc per unit of production as yields are so much lower. So that organic produce you are eating on average requires more resources to cultivate and therefore creates more greenhouse gases during its cultivation.


I think the strongest arguments for buying organic concern farming practices (free range etc) and, if you think so, taste (which of course is entirely subjective). However, it?s clearly not the panacea some believe it to be.


http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2012/september/organic.html

http://www.ox.ac.uk/media/news_stories/2012/120904.html


Jeremy Wrote:

>

> Anyway, I generally avoid organic stuff, because I

> don't want to pay the extra price, and I am

> cynical about the benefits.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605632
Share on other sites

Interesting take on the purpose of standards in food production. Distinctions between good and bad are subjective, moral, views - in my view. Standards related to food production give producers objectives to meet in animal husbandry, use of chemicals etc and consumers reassurance that the produce meets their requirements, given an effective regulatory system.


There are lots of different standards systems but they are actually about ensuring commercial viability of the ethical proposition more than moral judgements about good and bad.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605648
Share on other sites

If you make a switch to organic food can I add that unless you buy it as locally grown & distributed as possible, you'll be paying some extra percentage for air miles. Many supermarkets are just flogging you fancier stuff from far far away, at maximum profit to themselves and far costlier than necessary to local economies and the environment.


The box schemes don't air freight produce. Their associate farms in Spain and France send us winter fresh stuff overland and sea.


Another point worth making, it's hard being an organic grower, & to exist free of supermarket buyers. If households order a veg box, the company will have supported the grower right the way through with extra help when needed,

e.g. to prepare the soil appropriately,

choose disease-resistant varieties,

predict within a fortnight when stuff's ready to pick,

& pay ahead of time for an entire field,- all to help this method's sustainability.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605660
Share on other sites

Sorry, but food being produced locally doesn't mean it will be cheaper to produce / sell or that it will require less fossil fuels to be cultivated (including shipping). The reason why some imported food is cheaper is because it is easier to produce in other parts of the world due to climactic conditions, labor costs etc (thus requiring less fossil fuels during the cultivation process). Neither organic food nor locally grown food is by definition more environmentally friendly than their non-organic / imported counterparts. It is just not that simple.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605679
Share on other sites

"Neither organic food nor locally grown food is by definition more environmentally friendly than their non-organic / imported counterparts."


That statement is not quite clear. One part is about whether organic growing is less environmentally costly, and the other is about whether local growing is less environmetally costly. Then you have included another point about imports and this again falls into two aspects, one which concerns non-organic production (I think). All parts of your post merit support with references, please LondonMix.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605686
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what's not clear. Food being produced organically or locally doesn't mean it is less damaging to the environment. Regarding organic food's environmental impact you can read the link to a recent Oxford university study in my earlier post. Regarding locally grown food there have been a few articles on this over the last few years. I'm on my phone but will try to find a link this evening.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605691
Share on other sites

Regarding why locally grown food is not always 'greener' please see the link below. Production techniques / natural resources have a significant impact on the amount of fossil fuels required to cultivate produce. These differences can wipe out transport miles differences (you can search for the case study of Swedish local tomatoes vs imported Spanish ones).


http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6064

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605699
Share on other sites

If you are saying it's complex, LM, then we would all have to agree on that. There's lots of potential for cherry picking - pun intended - your favourite bit of the system to make your point. I noted from my skim of the World Watch article that eating lower down the food chain would make a difference - something I pointed out in my earlier post. The article ends on a brief examination of transportation systems which could be made more carbon neutral but for a truly local to us example of how this can work you only need to look at the electric van used by Local Greens, the local veg bag scheme.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27757-organic-food/#findComment-605716
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I do hope NOT. He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
    • Nope, I'd just get on with my day and forget about it. And I wouldn't report them on the basis that they might spill my coffee in the future.  However the OP seems to think that this young woman is deliberately pushing her bell, slamming her gate etc, having repeatedly been asked not to. I'd wager the woman is a bit pee'd off and there's a bit of a stand-off going on. Best course of action is to go out, take the parcel, smile sweetly, say hello, tell her you hope she's having a nice day / staying cool etc, in a way that comes across as genuine and not pass-agg,  and to let it diffuse. Might find it calms down a bit.  But I like the girl hate the idea of her being denigrated on here when she works so hard. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...