Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In my experience parents from poorer families make sure that their children are clean and well presented

Some families paticularly well off ones prefer to let their children grow wild

I know nits like clean hair bellenden belle (especially long hair)

they dont like being washed in nit repellent shampoo tho

so it's fine for girls to have longer hair but not boys? If nits prefer longer hair shouldn't the advice be for both boys AND girls to have shorter hair? Or do you just have some objection to boys with longer hair? Boys should be boys and girls girls, is that it?

LocalTeacher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In my experience parents from poorer families make

> sure that their children are clean and well

> presented

> Some families paticularly well off ones prefer to

> let their children grow wild



This is easily the biggest piece of bollocks I've ever read on this forum. Whether you are trying to provoke some kind of weird nit-related class debate or not, you have made me laugh. I'm off to decide whether I fit into the clean, well presented children poor family set, or the children running wild, long haired, nit-ridden middle classes...

Oh dear. Would you be happy to post these kinds of statements under your real name? Do you think your anti middle-class (or any sections of the society for that matter) attitude would be acceptable to/ tolerated by the parents, pupils and colleagues at your school? I dare you to share your thoughts with them in person. I really hope you are not a teacher.



LocalTeacher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In my experience parents from poorer families make

> sure that their children are clean and well

> presented

> Some families paticularly well off ones prefer to

> let their children grow wild

> I know nits like clean hair bellenden belle

> (especially long hair)

> they dont like being washed in nit repellent

> shampoo tho

Ondine if everybody washed their hands properly after using the toilet the noro virus would be short lived.

Oimissus its upto you how you dress your child, im not suggesting all boys and girls should have crew cuts , but if your child has long hair you need to be extra vigilant for nits.

funny, primary school i went in was full of poor kids with short hair and nits was a common problem. I have no money, am a hybrid of classes and an have a son with wildish longish hair who's never had nits. Can't see what social class has to do with it whatsoever, unless it's a new breed of discerning deli-loving biters.

I comb my Daughter's long hair with a nit comb once a week and use tea tree oil. It has not and will not stop her getting nits - although I might notice them sooner? Not sure if this makes me middle class.

On the same note washing hands after using the toilet will not completly erridicate norovirus as there are many other possible methods of transmission.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yiddish is written in Hebrew script, traditionally, so any attempt to use 'Roman' script will be transliteration, as noted. Hebrew script does not have vowels as such, so any vowels used will try to copy the Yiddish sound of the word. Bagel and Beigel are both correct transliterations of the Yiddish word. 
    • Have they still not fixed it? that's pretty shabby. I took this picture on New Year's Day and it's been like this at least since before Xmas.     
    • To be fair, if I saw you eating any of the parcels I'd have walked out. I noticed last night that the illuminated sign now describes this place as the POT OFFICE. Presumably THC vapes are more profitable than being a drop-off point for bloody Evri
    • Housebuilding isn't that profitable and housebuilders don't have social responsibilities. The affordable housing component is just a tax on new builds. It's a total failure by government - a fantasy belief that the private sector is going to solve the state's social housing crisis for free. It's like expecting Tesco to solve child humgrr by giving away a percentage of its products. It's not gonna work - it just slows down and disincentivises private sector construction of new housing. The only solution to the housing crisis is a massive increase in the supply of housing, not a couple of "affordable" flats in a new development. The state needs to solve the problem of NIMBYs (one of whom is prominent on this thread), get out of the way of private sector developers building private rentals and homes for sale, and borrow to build a huge amount of social housing.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...