Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are you being adversely affected by the LTN measures? Like many of us you will have suffered increase levels of pollution as a resident and pedestrian. And as a bus passenger, or vehicle driver, you will have suffered increased delays.


You may also have been unfairly penalised for driving down a street at the wrong time.


To counter the LTN campaign some of us are arranging for the supply of message boards - similar to those used by estate agents. These boards can be mounted on poles (also being supplied),displayed in windows or on walls. See attached. Board size is 600mm x 600mm.


This will be of particular interest to people on EDG, Lordship Lane, Croxted Road, Dulwich Village, Gallery Road etc


If you would be willing to display one of these boards, please get in touch by PM.

Sure, see attached.


How many do you want for your friends and neighbours ?




mfcjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Great idea, stop the LTN injustice, YOUR LUNGS

> MATTER not just Tarquins and Jemimas, can i have

> one that says anyone but labour and remind people

> they can vote this bunch of shysters out in less

> than 1 year.

You may need advertisement consent from Southwark Council and a licence from the Dulwich Estate to erect an "estate agent" style sign.


You may want to check the Planning Portal as this type of sign does not fall under Class 3 of the advertisement control system in England. The present rule is the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 2007 which has been in force since 6 April 2007.

mr whyte Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Droid - better make sure you check your slogans

> with the thought police on this forum first. Make

> sure your not using offensive words like "matter"

> or "all"... ;)



No matter how hard you try, and how genuine your intentions, someone on here will find a way to extrapolate what you have specified in your poster as either racist, sexist, anti-environmental, or drugs related!

Have checked the regulations and they would not be infringed.

The rules on Estate Agents boards are quite simple and largely refer to size, position and quantity.


Check this out....


https://www.hendersonsigns.co.uk/blog/estate-agent-boards-rule-and-regulations/


https://landlordlawblog.co.uk/2015/10/28/about-letting-agents-boards/


Google is a friend.



Jooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You may need advertisement consent from Southwark

> Council and a licence from the Dulwich Estate to

> erect an "estate agent" style sign.

>

> You may want to check the Planning Portal as this

> type of sign does not fall under Class 3 of the

> advertisement control system in England. The

> present rule is the Town and Country Planning

> (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 2007 which

> has been in force since 6 April 2007.

Jooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You may need advertisement consent from Southwark

> Council and a licence from the Dulwich Estate to

> erect an "estate agent" style sign.

>


Shhh - Throughout London we're all putting up signs about the Cladding Scandal and if planning want to complain they may want to pay for replacement cladding and the other issues that a failed system caused :)

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It seems the rather unpleasant discourse; by those

> in favour of the current LTNs in Dulwich, on the

> DA poster is ok for rahrahrah, with it's latest

> nasty bit of posting, but this one isn't?



I don't even know what this means. The point is, one doesn't need to create a new thread every time they want to comment on LTNs, either for or against. There are at least half a dozen separate threads on the topic already.

  • 2 weeks later...

Don't forget to fill in the Southwark 'consultation' on the Dulwich LTN road closures/traffic cameras/fines etc


Link is here- https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/dulwich-review/


Please urgently share with your friends/neighbours etc too


Last chance to get these money making/polluting measures removed...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That is the similar issue with Peckham Rye - the council have prioritised commercial interests over the community (residents and environment), and utterly shameless in doing so. For a council to be wilfully cirumventing legal ruling, is more than alarming. Their actions should always be transparent and beyond reproach, not shady and biased for particular commercial interest. It raises the question of where else they manipulate commercial interests and generally look to break rules.    
    • I can't see it will ever be finally resolved, unfortunately. Although the local problems were made much worse due to the move of the Sylvester Road  delivery office to Peckham, Royal Mail has had issues ever since it was privatised. Whenever the local MP gets involved, things get a bit better temporarily, then they just deteriorate again. I hope I'm wrong, but there are similar postal delivery issues all over the country. I think there are currently discussions ongoing to change the delivery requirements which Royal Mail is supposed to adhere to for first and second class post. Silly question, but are you actually expecting letters? I haven't had any post for ages either, but I'm not expecting any! Much stuff these days is done by email or on apps. The East Dulwich delivery office is in Peckham, not West Dulwich?
    • Hi, over the last few years, I have had a problems with my joint freeholder. For the last 15 years there has been roof leaks and we had some repairs done around 2016 but I got another leak a few years ago. Instead of investing money in a new roof or RICS survey, the joint freeholder is trying to force me to pay for non-essential work in hallway (tiling, new door and repainting) which will come to approximately £3K via Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenants Act 1985. We keep going around in circles and I want to suggest a mediator again (ideally with a property solicitor). Key reason I am wanting to work with a lawyer is my joint freeholder is also solicitor, so needs to be someone who has expertise of leases. I have proposed a managing agent for maintenance for the building or a declaration of trust but they wont agree, so we are unable to move forward. We are just two flats in one house and trust has completely broken down. I think they are trying to make life so difficult that I sell, so they can do an extension. I love my flat and I am not in a situation where I can move. Can anyone suggest a mediator that can help us find some common ground? Any advice welcome and DM if you prefer. 
    • This problem has been going on since before Covid due to the closure of the Dulwich sorting office. The local MP Ellie Reeves is aware and has written to the Post Office. They give the same generic responses about 'temporary' staffing issues. Would encourage people to email Ellie Reeves. It's about time this was finally resolved!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...