Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In todays Sunday Times apparently;


'Southwark levied ?2.5 million of camera fines in three months from 2 schemes- the 1 in Dulwich Village generated 22,424 fines in 7 weeks. These are generally ?130 each or half that if paid within 14 days'


Does anyone actually still believe that these LTN's, road closures, cameras & parking bays/meters are for anything other than making money for Southwark council?!


Are we going to let them carry on treating us residents like idiots?


Put up not anti Road Closure poster, fill in the consultation & get involved otherwise we will all be accepting this nonsense

{Great, every one on display counts.


The deal is ?5 per sign, so you probably need two so you get one facing each way to the traffic and ?5 for the pole if you need one.


Please PM with your phone number and we can discuss collection/delivery.


David}


SO YOUR A MONEY MAKING MACHINE TOO. Great.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mr whyte Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Droid - better make sure you check your slogans

> > with the thought police on this forum first.

> Make

> > sure your not using offensive words like

> "matter"

> > or "all"... ;)

>

>

> No matter how hard you try, and how genuine your

> intentions, someone on here will find a way to

> extrapolate what you have specified in your poster

> as either racist, sexist, anti-environmental, or

> drugs related!



YAWN... it doesn't normally take much to bring the old "I'm not racist, but..." gang out to play - in this case absolutely no-one made any comment of this nature whatsoever, but still here we are.


It's worth remembering that the Dulwich Alliance were themselves quick to recognise that their BLM appropriating posters did cause offence and quite rightly removed them.

So each sign is costing ?15 - excellent! I guess, like the fines, its totally optional so up to people what they want to spend their cash on.



kntrade2012 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> {Great, every one on display counts.

>

> The deal is ?5 per sign, so you probably need two

> so you get one facing each way to the traffic and

> ?5 for the pole if you need one.

>

> Please PM with your phone number and we can

> discuss collection/delivery.

>

> David}

>

> SO YOUR A MONEY MAKING MACHINE TOO. Great.

kmtrade wrote..

----------------------

> SO YOUR A MONEY MAKING MACHINE TOO. Great.


@kntrade,


I find it very sad that you have taken such a cynical stance.


We are actually subsidising the cost of the signs. Our actual cost is ?5.40 each. They are made by Xpress signs in Sydenham.


I am quite prepared to show the invoice to you and anyone who wants to view it but should you be in doubt, ask any supplier for a quotation for the following:


1. Correx sign 5mm thick.

2. Size 705mm x 705mm

3. Two colour print.

4. Qty = 50

5. Inclusive of delivery.


If you come up with a better price, let us know.


This is a community project and not a profit-orientated venture. In addition, the make up of the signs/poles and their installation is being done free of charge. To make the poles secure and vandal-proof, they have to be securely fixed and this is most often to brick/concrete walls which requires a fair amount of time and effort.


So kindly spare us cynicism. It is unjustified and inappropriate.




kntrade2012 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> {Great, every one on display counts.

>

> The deal is ?5 per sign, so you probably need two

> so you get one facing each way to the traffic and

> ?5 for the pole if you need one.

>

> Please PM with your phone number and we can

> discuss collection/delivery.

>

> David}

>

> SO YOUR A MONEY MAKING MACHINE TOO. Great.

Excellent suggestion about the shops on LL.

So far we have been door-knocking on EDG only as we are EDG residents primarily. It's a long street and it takes time to visit and discuss matters!


We would be delighted if some of the shops displayed our signs because I understand many are suffering badly.


If you or they want to obtain signs, please PM me a phone number and we can discuss. We can also deliver depending on where they are needed..



These road closures are so unfair, unjustified and damaging to many that we will do anything we can to assist other with expressing their views.

Please consider saving the attached photo on your phone and showing it to others who may want to help the cause.



Cora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there somewhere local we could pick up posters?

> Maybe a local business could have some on Lordship

> Lane?

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don?t think fixing the traffic issues is that

> binary, however obvious and point-scorey the

> slogan may be.


slogans like 'stop the LTN Congestion' or 'all streets matter' you mean?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...