Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's the fella, though it was really a series of wars that noone could quite remember why anyone had thought it was a good idea in the first place by the end .


We had one about the same time, except at the end the winners wholeheartedly embraced what it had been really about all along, which wasn't all this honourable parliamentary independence stuff, but eradicating the world of papists.

Given tradition in Italian and vatican politics, there was a period when Popes were always rich, powerful, scheming, womanising types carving out their own empire and far more concerned about temporal than spiritual matters.


Surely there's only one candidate for the role!!!


 

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> El Pibe Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It was more fun when we had three popes!

>

>

> Ah yes, the True Pope, the Grid Pope and the

> Magnetic Pope.


Or the fourth Pope.....


http://www.funnyreign.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/pope-soap1.jpg The Soap Pope on a rope ?

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not fighting,just correcting Mick Mac's

> aqpparent impression that Germans are protestant.

> In fact, the south (eg Bavaria)for instance is

> overwhelmingly catholic. The Pope is from Bavaria.


Well, they started it. And therefore have a lot to answer for. What's a little indulgence and nepotism between friends.

hi El pipe ,ahhahahahhahahaha u made me laught .no berlusconi no!!!!!!please

may beppe grillo ?!?!?!?!?

i think the better thing is to sell all the gold the vaticano have and send it to the poor population .....who still need the water ,food ......

and at the end of the day .they know already who ll be the next ..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...