Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh I thought that was an offer. ;-)


Didn't see it. As someone who never me their half sister till I was 18 (and she was 30 something) I can safely say never has the topic of a programme made me quite so dis-inclined to watch it.


"Let's all laugh at the freaks! Look at them, ma - quick they're running away. After them!"

That's strange, as statistically, your child is more likely to have "problems" if born to a mother over 40 than to brother and sister. Abnormalities only tend to happen if repeated incest occurs through generations as genetic deficiencies and susceptibilities multiply. Hence why the European Royals are all messed up. Cousins marrying cousins for centuries.


Although brother and sister marriages and any children hey had is deemed socially unacceptable the idea of them producing a freak of a baby is a horror-movie myth.

Knowingly hopping in the sack with your sibling is weird, but just imagine for a moment that you found out tomorrow that your partner, spouse, whatever, was actually your long lost sibling. Would you just be able to turn off your feelings for them because society deemed it correct? I have nothing but the deepest sympathy for the people in these cases!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...