Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I?ve just watched a car scrape the back of my van as I was parked in a bay on lordship Lane opposite Chener Books/TruePenny's estate agents.

I was in such shock I was too slow to note down the license plate, and a van then pulled up after it, blocking my view.


Does anyone know if there is CCTV that might capture that stretch of the road/the parking bays?


Thank you.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/296189-cctv-on-lordship-lane/
Share on other sites

According to the council (and the police) there is no CCTV on Lordship lane. TFL have cameras that only record real time for traffic flow so will not have any recording. You could try local businesses with their CCTv - tho this is usually restricted to outside pavement only so unlikely to project as far as the kerb/road. Totally sympathise.
I think Ulez is quite different to any other recording - there is no manpower to check for infringement even if you have the time and date. So frustrating- we had a personal car crime and i suggested to the police that I would personally sit thru any cctv to save them the trouble (I am dbs checked) and they told me there is no recording available.

That can't be the case, surely, otherwise if you are already parked within the ULEZ zone you won't be picked up and charged unless you drive out of it.



KH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> CPR Dave Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does that mean there are no ULEZ cameras on

> > Lordship Lane too

>

>

> Are those cameras solely at the ULEZ boundary - so

> the junction with Dulwich Common for example?

P3girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sandyman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That can't be the case, surely, otherwise if

> you

> > are already parked within the ULEZ zone you

> won't

> > be picked up and charged unless you drive out

> of

> > it.

> >

> >

> There will be 750 cameras and some will be within

> the ULEZ area. not just on the borders. We do not

> know where they are located yet but a couple of

> excerpts from the TFL web site appear relevant:-

>

> Quote...

> Even if you make a short trip in the zone using a

> vehicle that doesn't meet the ULEZ emissions

> standards, you need to pay the daily change.

> However. if you are parked within the zone but

> don't drive, you don't need to pay the ULEZ

> charge

>

> Unquote

>

> Well, after all it is a revenue stream.


Interesting. I guess all will be revealed next week!

They use the same cameras for different types of enforcement as I understand it. So there aren't specific 'ULEZ' cameras, just TFL ones. A map of all the locations is here: https://londonist.com/london/transport/an-interactive-live-traffic-map-of-london


It looks like we need more in the area if they're going to effectively cut down on short, local journey's in the most polluting vehicles.

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is a revenue stream but TFL are not a profit

> organisation so all revenue is fed back in to

> improve transport around London (eg new Bakerloo

> line).

> While people may feel heavily inconvenienced, car

> pollution is a real problem.


Yep, it?s a positive move imo

Build a guided bus system, or the new kind of tramlines that are "glued" down and so less expensive, or trolleybuses to fill the gap provided by the rolling back on teh Bakerloo extension. Money would be saved but there wouldn't be any investment in housing, etc. that often goes alongside Tube expansion.

Hi KH, What rotten bad luck.

I presume you're asking if ay of the businesses around that section of Lordship Lane have CCTV cameras - I think you'd need to visit the businesses and ask them.


KH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?ve just watched a car scrape the back of my van

> as I was parked in a bay on lordship Lane opposite

> Chener Books/TruePenny's estate agents.

> I was in such shock I was too slow to note down

> the license plate, and a van then pulled up after

> it, blocking my view.

>

> Does anyone know if there is CCTV that might

> capture that stretch of the road/the parking bays?

>

>

> Thank you.

Thanks James. I had messaged a couple of shops directly opposite, but they who weren't able to help. But good idea to walk down the lane and see who else might have a camera that may have captured the road.


Thanks.



James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi KH, What rotten bad luck.

> I presume you're asking if ay of the businesses

> around that section of Lordship Lane have CCTV

> cameras - I think you'd need to visit the

> businesses and ask them.

>

> KH Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I?ve just watched a car scrape the back of my

> van

> > as I was parked in a bay on lordship Lane

> opposite

> > Chener Books/TruePenny's estate agents.

> > I was in such shock I was too slow to note down

> > the license plate, and a van then pulled up

> after

> > it, blocking my view.

> >

> > Does anyone know if there is CCTV that might

> > capture that stretch of the road/the parking

> bays?

> >

> >

> > Thank you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
    • Fernando came and sorted out our very overgrown garden.  He is a very friendly chap, works meticulously and charges very fair prices.   We’ve been using his Services for many years now and will continue to do so.    Here are his contact details if you have any gardening questions: Fernando - 07946 757938       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...