Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just seen this on nextdoor.


As I understand it Southwark were originally planning a three storey block but have now told residents there that the plan is for a six storey development.


See here



https://www.change.org/p/save-lordship-lane-estate?recruiter=376456640&recruited_by_id=36086460-555c-11e5-8202-c396c0ce3f5d&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=petition_dashboard


https://lordshiplane.commonplace.is/proposals/have-your-say-on-the-lordship-lane-estate


Not sure of all the background but thought folk might be interested. Copies of some correspondence etc with residents at https://www.southwark.gov.uk/housing/new-council-homes/where-we-re-building/dulwich-wood/lordship-lane-estate

But of course - squeeze in more people in already busy area, take away whatever little green space people have and add more noise (more people, more cars etc) - just because you can!


How about a six storey block on Court Lane instead? Or several?

sally buying Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is certainly a very large space that is

> Court Lane Gardens that a large housing unit could

> be built upon.

>

> What are the chances of this happening. Council

> housing in a gated community.


For a second I thought you were suggesting the so called "Dulwich Square" of shame


That could have been a fitting use of a now closed road 😱

ab29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But of course - squeeze in more people in already

> busy area, take away whatever little green space

> people have and add more noise (more people, more

> cars etc) - just because you can!

>

> How about a six storey block on Court Lane

> instead? Or several?


Yes, let's just keep people in temporary accomodation instead

How about a six storey block on Court Lane instead? Or several?


redpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ab29 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But of course - squeeze in more people in

> already

> > busy area, take away whatever little green

> space

> > people have and add more noise (more people,

> more

> > cars etc) - just because you can!

> >

> > How about a six storey block on Court Lane

> > instead? Or several?

>

> Yes, let's just keep people in temporary

> accomodation instead

ab29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How about a six storey block on Court Lane

> instead? Or several?

>

> redpost Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ab29 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > But of course - squeeze in more people in

> > already

> > > busy area, take away whatever little green

> > space

> > > people have and add more noise (more people,

> > more

> > > cars etc) - just because you can!

> > >

> > > How about a six storey block on Court Lane

> > > instead? Or several?

> >

> > Yes, let's just keep people in temporary

> > accomodation instead


A developer would need 2+ neighbouring plots to put up a block of flats, unlikely to happen so court lane plots stay as houses


Why the fixation on court lane?


Where else is the council supposed to get the land from?

I'm a little confused about this petition - it says that the 6 storey proposed block would 'dwarf surrounding blocks', but then all those in the photo appear to have 6 stories. Are there smaller blocks surrounding the area where building is proposed?
I agree that we need housing and if that means building on land currently used for garages, then good! I like the idea of low high-rise, or whatever the official term is. I like the 3 and 4-storey buildigns you see around, like on Walworth Road and even Lordship Lane. It seems sensible to build up another twenty feet than build out, though I do understand that such accommodation is not suitable for all.
It's a complex issue and one that is becoming more complex after the council's policy to sell off a lot of council sites to private property developers over the last 10 years or so (much of it because the running costs had become too high as buildings aged and fell into disrepair). Much of the re-development of Elephant and Castle has come at the cost of council homes so the council has to find new places to build homes to replace those lost.

redpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ab29 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > How about a six storey block on Court Lane

> > instead? Or several?

> >

> Why the fixation on court lane?


It's part of the "Southwark is being ruined by a cabal of Court Lane-residing plutocrats and Bolshevik civil servants" conspiracy theory.

Moovart Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also difficult to get planning permission for a

> higher building than those adjacent.

>

> Lordship lane estate already has 6 storey blocks


The rear of the estate facing Dulwich Common has three blocks each which makes the proposed block a blot on the landscape.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...