Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think we need secure places for bicycles at home. If you live in a terraced house converted to flats, or share a terraced house with lots of other people who want to cycle, or live in a small flat on the fourth floor of a block ... there's nowhere safe to leave your bike overnight.


I think that lots of people who don't cycle at the moment might if they had somewhere to keep a bike. Even if they only use it for short journeys. Especially if they only use it for short journeys! That's what makes it normal - lots of people, of all ages, just popping to the shops or to visit a friend by bike.


Look at this brilliant project in Lambeth using Bike Hangars - they are secure mini-sheds for 5 or 6 bikes that sit on the street and take up half a car parking space each. http://www.cyclehoop.com/product/bike-lockers/bike-hangar


Lambeth ran a pilot in Bonnington Square (near Oval) and are now putting in 26 hangars as part of a larger traffic calming scheme around Hackford Road, off Brixton Road.

http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/Services/TransportStreets/GrassRoutesStreetsForPeople.htm


Wouldn't it be great if Southwark tried putting in a couple of bike hangars in a street in East Dulwich?

Thanks for the link to the cycling mums piece Jakido - interesting.


Yes, I agree Townleygreen folding bikes look like a good solution for some people. (I've never tried riding one!) The proposed Brompton hub at Peckham Rye station could be interesting... There's a very impressive Brompton hire dock at Manchester Piccadilly.


But my feeling is that - as you imply - there isn't one solution that works for all. We need to make it possible to ride safely and conveniently on bikes of different sizes, adult trikes, cargo bikes and box bikes, when pulling trailers or using child seats ... lots of different answers.

+1 on potholes - I speak as someone who lost a suit jacket and a fair amount of blood after unscheduled contact with the tarmac last summer thanks to one of the many huge potholes toward the LL end of East Dulwich Grove. The lesson holds for the rest of ED: it's no good having a nice green cycle lane painted on the road if the surface itself isn't fit for two wheels.


One thing that would help a lot: a bit more careful monitoring of road repairs. On my 2 mile daily commute I could point out about a dozen hazardous potholes which are probably on a council spreadsheet as "repaired" when really all that has happened is that someone (Conway?) has dumped a spoonful of tarmac in the middle of them then filed an invoice.

James,


Regarding the Spurling Road cycle contraflow. This deserves the status of "ghost cycle route" ? how would anyone know it's there since it isn't signed and there's no indication from the roundabout that cyclists are permitted to use the facility? I'm afraid it's yet another example of embarrassingly half-hearted cycle facilities, for which the UK is justly famous throughout Europe.


See, for example http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/gallery/2009/oct/20/crap-cycle-lanes


Kind regards,

Enough with the vendetta against Conways. It's really boring and gives every appearance of being an obsessive, creepy stalker. If you are an OCS, then fine. But if not, maybe want to give some thought to how you come across to others. Just saying!

The FM Conways contract Southwark has agreed is considered cheaper than pan London deals others have signed-up for.

But we have had a number of local issues where contracted aspects such as keeping residnets advised and informed just doesnt happen effectively. The work on Crystal Palace Road for example had huge number of snagging issues - that went on for months and months after the official works had ended.


So I can understand the odd residents having a thing about them if they've been on the receiving end.

Sorry, haven't read the whole thread so might not be the best place to ask but didn't think a new post was warranted. Can anyone advise how to request a 2 way cycle path on a one-way street? It would make my life so much easier cycling to Peckham Rye station if the 2 northern sections of Choumert Road were 2-way for cyclists. I can't seem to find a quiet alternative that doesn't add time to my journey.

Blame Boris for my use of 'normalise' (see his quote in first post).


Happy to change the title if you'd like to suggest something - i am interested in how we could make cycling the normal way to get around, as opposed to driving. e.g. the school run involves families cycling to school rather than sitting in a car.


Thanks everyone else for your suggestions, i see elsewhere James Barber has announced that cycle superhighway 6 is due to arrive on Lordship Lane in 2015. This should help cycle commuters at least.


Jakido

  • 1 month later...

From the TIMES NEWSPAPER TODAY


David Cameron is being urged to start a cycling revolution as a cross-party group of MPs and peers calls for the transformation of Britain?s streets.


Motoring organisations, road safety professionals and opposition MPs welcomed proposals that they claim would save lives, improve public health and save millions of pounds spent treating preventable disease.


The recommendations come after a four-month parliamentary inquiry, inspired by The Times Cities Fit for Cycling campaign, into how to encourage more cycling and to protect those on the roads.


The inquiry?s proposals include:


? A default 20mph speed limit on residential streets.


? Access for all schoolchildren to cycle training.


? Better road surfaces and junctions.


? Widespread segregated cycle routes.


? Improved lorry design and driver training.


? Stricter enforcement of road traffic law.

ellabrunswick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think we need secure places for bicycles at

> home. If you live in a terraced house converted to

> flats, or share a terraced house with lots of

> other people who want to cycle, or live in a small

> flat on the fourth floor of a block ... there's

> nowhere safe to leave your bike overnight.

>

> I think that lots of people who don't cycle at the

> moment might if they had somewhere to keep a bike.


xxxxxxx


Agreed.


That is exactly my problem.


I had some cycle lessons last year, which were great and made me a lot more confident, but I have nowhere to keep a bike.


Townleygreen, someone I know who has several bikes including a Brompton says folding bikes are quite unstable and weird to ride, do you not find that?


Also, how long does it take you to fold and unfold it?


I'm not sure I can afford one but I might consider it if I thought I would actually use it a lot.

I have an idea? how about getting the coach parking off East Dulwich Grove in front of JAGs.This bottlenecks the traffic into a death trap for cyclists.The coaches could use the ample grounds within JAGs or even Greendale.

There used to be a cycle path along this part of EDG but it was taken out to make room for the coaches.

susiq Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> perhaps cyclist could pay something towards road

> tax or pay for some sort of road tax.


There is no such thing as road tax; it was abolished in 1937. Roads are paid for from general taxation which cyclists are just as subject to as every other citizen.


The current actual terminology for what motorists like to call 'road tax' is vehicle excise duty which is based on emissions. Cyclists (unless they're refuelling on beans) don't emit toxic fumes so their VED would be nothing. The other zero-emission vehicles (electric cars etc) are also heavier and therefore more likely to damage road surfaces than cyclists.


The other key thing mentioned in that report is the health benefits if you get more people cycling and therefore the money put into cycling infrastructure should be seen as an investment in future lower NHS costs for obesity/heart disease/diabetes.

Sue, in answer to your questions:

"Townleygreen, someone I know who has several bikes including a Brompton says folding bikes are quite unstable and weird to ride, do you not find that?


Also, how long does it take you to fold and unfold it?"


They are no way unstable at all! thousands of them have been sold by this company which makes them in Britain amazingly and they are great.

When I was trying one out (at Evans Cycles in Clapham) the guy serving me folded it in 9 seconds! I can't do it that fast, but it takes less than a minute, and the same to fold it up again.

Try one out at Evans or wherever, see for yourself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not really since the first world war, and mainly in the sense then of 'getting a Blighty one' meaning a wound so serious you had to be sent home. I seriously doubt if one school child in 100 now would know what Blighty meant if the word was presented on its own with no context. 
    • 1 space available due to one of my clients moving.  Message me for more informations  🙂  
    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...