Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it emperor's new clothes or do I just not get Gervais. The Office and Extras were truly great, and he knew when to pull the plug on both. Perhaps it is the assoication with Jonathan Ross, but he says something that is pandering to the audience but is so unfunny. "What is the point of Iceland, let's pave it over". Audience in raptures. No, not funny, not clever, just said in a deadpan way.


And on my list of hates, Jimmy Carr, again so deadpan I just want to punch him. I viewed Jack Dee that way, but have to acknowledge the bloke is talented, but in the past not my cup of tea.


So to be positive (and I wont go on about all the greats I have seen, in particularly during their formative years), Adam Hills and chums in the Last Leg (maybe a one series wonder, but let's see).

Jeremy Hardy invariably annoys me - smug comic who appears to be incapable of looking at, or making a joke about, any subject except through a left wing prism. He came of age with the "alternative comedy" circus in the 80s and has yet to develop further.


As for good comics - Billy Connollly in his day was brilliant - the period between leaving the folk music bands and emerging ASAP stand up while he was still playing & singing solo were amazing gigs.

Can there be any act more pointless then telling someone bent over double with laughter that the person they're watching 'isn't funny'?


Hard to resist though. To pluck one out of the air: Ross Noble.. does nothing for me.


And Stewart Lee's live show will be the highlight of this year, same as it was the last - no doubt.

I like The Office a lot. Extras make me laugh a bit, but just thought he was playing the same character. I agree with KK that deadpan and sarcasm are great in comedy (Les Dawson was a God!), but RG just doesn't do it well.


Loved Jack Dee in the mid to late 90s. That's how you do deadpan, and that stuff still makes me laugh. Like hearing him host "I'm sorry, I haven't a clue" these days.


Eddie Izzard peaked with Dress to Kill in 98 or 99. A perfect stand up show IMO, better than anything he's done since.


Sean Lock cracks me up. Got a DVD of his a couple of years ago, which I found disappointing. However, "Lockipedia" was a great show.


Like Chris Rock too.

Lenny Henry was great in his prime, and "Live and Unleashed" still makes me laugh because it was him at his best, and it takes me back.


To be fair to him, I don't think he even tries being a comedian anymore. But yeah, I don't think I'd rush to see him iof he announced a stand up tour tomorrow.


 

I know it's tantamount to blasphemy to say this in these environs, but I find Micky Flanagan a terrible one trick pony - hilarious on first outing, but now out of material (other than that East Dulwich sells olives and he likes to wear a vest, and putting on borderline-racist funny accents).


Same goes for Peter Kay (and yes, Jeremy, northern accents ARE inherently funny - I went to school in Bolton, so I'm allowed to say that). "Garlic? on bread?" - never not funny. His cheese in a cake reprise, never remotely funny.

Agree with Rosie. MF has had me really laughing, and he's had me saying "yeah yeah". Agree about PK too, I quite enjoyed the show with the garlic bread bit (was it blackpool?), but other than that it's boring.


Has anyone seen Jon Richardson do stand up? I like him on 8 out of 10 cats, but not seen his stand up stuff.

I blame tv comedy panel shows - for nearly everthing.


Doesn't anybody ever tire of seeing the same two dozen faces dole-out their 'edgy' matey comedic backslapping mediocrity-fests week after week after week? Six hours of recorded material edited to within an inch of its life accompanied by an audience of 300 syncophants bathed in pink lighting who shit themselves with unadulterated laughter 0.1s after each and every tired line is delivered?


It seems not.

I'm so over the F word. It's not nearly so funny as comedians think it is. Is it their default for when their material isn't that funny? Daniel Kitson was the last (in a long line) of comedians who have worn it out. I'm not saying don't use it, but not in every sentence PLEASE.

Sorry Rosie.


Not laughing when everyone else is falling about is like getting to a party when everyone is already drunk isn't it?


Basically, I'm afraid I find most comedians unfunny. Sometimes I do find them funny and then I hear new material and it isn't funny at all. I've found Ricky Gervais really funny in the past, but not now. Eddie Izzard is never not funny.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sadly, a lot of businesses didn't invite reviews on the EDF at that time due to a number of "negative nellies" that would take delight in posting unfavourable comments, often despite never being to the business in question.  No matter how good the place was, some posters would find fault that wasn't there "don't lile the colour of the bidet set in the private bathroom, avocado 😅" Can hardly blame businesses at the time for not wanting reviews on here, thankfully that has mostly changed now.   
    • Was that the Hare Krishna place? I can't remember exactly where it was (or maybe still is) but it was somewhere around Oxford Street.
    • The "for sale" section on this forum lets people offer things for free or cheaply. And the "wanted" section let's people ask for things they want or need, for free or cheaply. There are also existing schemes like Freecycle, and also local  food banks. And there is (or was) a local scheme where you can bring things to be repaired free. I think it is/was based in Nunhead. Isn't that simpler than having a barter system? You might have something to give away, but the person who wants it might not have anything you want. Or have I misunderstood how it works? I can see that offering services free might not fit into existing schemes, but depending on what they were, what would happen if things went horribly wrong eg someone wrecked your house? Sorry if the above sounds very negative. 
    • I'm wondering why they would do that? Because surely positive reviews could only help them, and if they thought they might get negative reviews, shouldn't they have been addressing the reasons that might be (unless someone had an unwarranted grudge against them)? But in any case, how could they have stopped people posting reviews on here? PS I have corrected your typo! 😃
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...