Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1. Search for something, sayyyy "bed for sale"

2. don't go into any post but click "start new thread in this section" link at bottom of search results.

3. press post

4. goto about this forum section.


Why people follow this workflow I'll never know, but follow it they clearly do.



orrrrrr ta least it did when I started writing this post.

Now it just throws a permission error, Im guessing admin is on the case


and now it does the right thing, well done otta and admin

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30625-why/#findComment-629535
Share on other sites

Accidents happen


But more often its people just not caring or giving a shit


If not enough people give a shit, the who,e place becomes unreadable and a mess. Have a look at the message board on lordship lane.com if you want to see the end result


You for example cfccfc2 have taken time out of your oh so busy life to say here here to someone else. This gives you little scope to claim any moral high ground


To address minders point. People have been "new to the forum" for years. But without this incessant and increasing litter. People are well within their rights to say its out of order just as they are when a tidy town becomes covered in crisp packets and other litter from newcomers

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30625-why/#findComment-629958
Share on other sites

I was killing time at work, but its something that I've genuibely wondered about, as I thought people were actively selecting this section rather than classifieds to swll stuff, and it struck me as pretty dumb, new or not.


As for having a life, I have two small kids, so I don't get out much.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30625-why/#findComment-629987
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...