Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


My kids are at 2 different private schools in the immediate area and I have noticed that there are very few children with SE22 postcodes in their classes eg in my daughter's class of 24 children, only 2 live in SE22. The situation is similar in my son's school. In fact more children live in Wandsworth than se22.


I wonder why - is it because the residents of East Dulwich can not afford it, are the local state schools as good, is it a decision based on active dislike of private education?


I would appreciate your views.

I am not at all sure why that would be as I do not have kids and have therefore not investigated local schools. I also don?t know what the average salary is in Wandsworth as opposed to here. Anecdotally though I can say that on a night out in Wandsworth you encounter far more of the pink-shirted, slicked back hair brigade than you do in ED.

I like this post.


Day after day there's always someone (on here) droning on about ED filling-up with 'braying' (this seems to be the adjective of choice, when you have no imagination to speak of) 'Hooray Henrys' (another one) - a demographic which which largely exists in caricature and imagination rather than reality.


In five years, the percentage of SE22'ers who send their children to private school will certainly be up on what it is now, but for the most part, SE22 will still be filled with people who can't afford it.

That demographic review doesn't seem right to me. It claims the population is largely young singles renting flats. I'd have said it was mostly families, with young kids, who've bought houses with huge mortgages.


Or perhaps there are more young singles renting flats but they're just less visible?

The areas my daughters friends came from were mostly West Dulwich, Herne Hill, Wandsworth, Clapham, Rotherhithe, Tulse Hill, one from Rotherhithe, one from Kensington and a few who came in from Surrey. So although none as far as I remember from East Dulwich, most were from the surrounding areas.

I think newly gentrified ED has lots of people with babies still. We'll see shortly where they end up. My two are also in a Dulwich private school, and, there are a number of classmates from peckham, camberwell, brixton, east dulwich, forest hill, streatham, as well as further afield - greenwich, wandsworth, clapham, etc...


Hot topic...best, otto

It is pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain that quite a lot of people in ED could push themselves to pay for private education. It is also pretty obvious that the children of a large proportion of those people have kids who are below prep school age.


It will be interesting to see if in a couple of years time they en masse choose state education over private education. If they do it should be to everyone's benefit.

There's a big difference between posing with a Bugaboo and being able to magic-up and extra ?20-?30k/year of disposable income in order to put two kids through private school.


I think many people here overestimate the actual wealth of SE22's recent spate of Dreaded Incomers.

SE22 parents have the choice of a lot of good quality (and improving) state primary schools, so the vast majority of SE22 parents are happy to send their children to Heber, Goodrich, St John's etc. When it comes to secondary, however, those who want to go to the local private schools are then competing with vast hordes from further afield. Added to this, the number of secondary school places at Alleyns that are open to new entrants is fairly small. This is because Alleyns virtually guarantees that if your child gets into Alleyns at age 4, then unless s/he is a complete bozo s/he will get a place all the way through to A level. And since the 4 year olds don't tend to come from SE22 (because the local state primaries are so good), relatively few SE22-ers get into their local private school.


I wonder if Alleyns has thought about the carbon footprint of all those Wandsworth invaders, when they have so much local talent they could be tapping into. (At a price, of course.)

trinity Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I wonder why - is it because the residents of East

> Dulwich can not afford it, are the local state

> schools as good, is it a decision based on active

> dislike of private education?

>

> I would appreciate your views.


It's an active dislike. A Residents' Committee was convened many years ago on this very subject and the motion almost unanimously agreed.

Also consider that a school with a good reputation attracts from all over, especially where private transport is available to ferry to/from all over London. I went to an independent near the centre of Birmingham and while there were quite a few people within walking distance, absolutely the majority travelled from all parts of the West Midlands, despite there being private/independent choices a lot closer to home.

State schools in Southwark are - with a few notable exceptions - pretty dire. My son (who lives with his mum in a nearby borough with equally bad state schools) has just been awarded a scholarship to a private school. He was rejected by all the decent local state schools which took no account of his academic achievement - they awarded places to kids under other criteria like distance from school, music scholarships and siblings being already in the school (in fact he was discriminated against for being bright by a number of these places because they used banding systems - the upper bands were more oversubscribed). We were left with a hopeless sink school and two offers of scholarships from private schools.


So less of the inverted snobbery towards parents who go private, please! I find it especially hypocritical coming from wealthy people who live in big houses but think they're being right-on sending their kids to the local comp (fine if it's a decent one in a posh catchment - we did not have this luxury).


More and more parents are going private to save their kids from failing schools and who can blame them? Thank goodness for great private schools like my son's.

I've never understand the lack of support State Schools give to bright kids.


There is seemingly no incentive for kids to be in the upper band, unless as a way of lowering your odds against getting into your choice of school.


My Mum decided I was going to go to Haberdashers' whatever happened, although I was turned down initially. You can't help being peeved when several kids from your school got in, with less academic merit.


Seems that not much has changed in the 20 or so years since I was at school.

So did you go to Haberdashers' in the end cdonline? That was our first choice - our son was in the top band but we received a letter to say he was 84th on the waiting list. We decided not to bother appealing! They don't seem to give a hoot if your kid is bright, hard-working and motivated, he'd be much better off if he had a statement. Which seems a little unfair.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...