Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This topic has made me laugh, I've noticed two (sort of) references to the Lord of the Rings and assumed that this is what it would be about....


The first one - Prancing Pony. That's the name of the Inn in the Fellowship of the Ring.


Habit forming - because I was in LOTR mode, I read that as hobbit forming.


I don't know what I'm on either.... :-S


(Welcome GEO - Watch out for Orcs and Nazgul. :))

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3088-prancing-pony/#findComment-95765
Share on other sites

I have a very well thumbed paperback copy of LOTR and a nice hardback version that I have NEVER read.


I also have a copy of the edition of The Hobbit that was read to me at infants school - took ages to find.


Harumph! ...


How about an all-night showing of the LOTR films?? >:D<


With beer..


and pointy hats..


and hairy feet ..

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3088-prancing-pony/#findComment-96097
Share on other sites

Jeez, yes - the Silmarillion. Made Foucault's Pendulum seem light reading.


MP, surely your fantabulous name doesn't need further embellishment - what does it mean, something like Bone Eater? Very cool. But I slightly suspect you of playing Dungeons & Dragons after that orc-fighting comment.


Moos Stormcrow - Official Nerd Going On and On Down From the Thread Where I Began.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3088-prancing-pony/#findComment-96151
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...