Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Transport for London are proposing to remove our route 12 Bus Dulwich Library - Oxford Circus i have just started a petition to try to convince them that they need to keep the 12 Bus route please see attached for link to petition - please pass onto as many people as you can or print off page, we have less than six weeks before the consultation period ends


regards


George

We have lots of buses, Asset. We have three routes along nearly all of LL, then the smaller routes (P4, 485, P13, P12 etc.) and the Rye Lane routes down to E and C and beyond.

I agree it is not a good idea to take away this route but to pretend we don't have a decent if not good number of routes is wrong.

It looks like it will be replaced by 148 according to this article: https://www.mylondon.news/lifestyle/travel/london-bus-routes-tfl-plans-24107649


"After Camberwell Road, Medlar Street, the 148 would turn left and follow the old route of the 12 to Dulwich Library instead of terminating at Camberwell Green"


So we will still have the route in some form though I wonder what the frequency will be.

The one-four-eight will pick up the slack. TfL is a costly thing to run so I can understand where the thinking is on this. I do think there are too many buses at certain times, resulting in bunching and extended journey times, which is good for noone and not the environment, either - static or near static diesel buses end to end is not a good look for TfL which is keen to burnish its green(ish) credentials.

BlueLeaf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By the way, it may be more effective to complete

> the official survey:

> https://haveyoursay.tfl.gov.uk/busreview


Agreed - waffling and whining on here is never likely to effect positive change.

Mabaker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's not good for the environment is having a

> reduced bus service making the car more

> attractive. What about those people who have

> mobility issues and find it difficult to hop on

> and off buses, let alone to keep changing along

> the route. Petition signed


This.


Petition signed also.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We have lots of buses, Asset. We have three routes

> along nearly all of LL, then the smaller routes

> (P4, 485, P13, P12 etc.) and the Rye Lane routes

> down to E and C and beyond.

> I agree it is not a good idea to take away this

> route but to pretend we don't have a decent if not

> good number of routes is wrong.

These routes are useless for those of us who work in the Central west end.

The 176 more often than not seems to stop short at Waterloo and those of us who work in retail and catering rely heavily on the 12 to get us to and from work at a price we can afford.

Mabaker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's not good for the environment is having a

> reduced bus service making the car more

> attractive. What about those people who have

> mobility issues and find it difficult to hop on

> and off buses, let alone to keep changing along

> the route. Petition signed


Amen to this!

Cauliflowerear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> The 12 is

> > iconic too.

>

> Iconic? No it isnt, catch yourself on. Its just

> another bus that hardly anyone outside of East

> Dulwich really cares about. Once you are a few

> stops up the road to Peckham, there are loads of

> other buses going the same way you can jump on,

> which is probably exactly why its getting canned.


No everyone wants to have to change busses to get to work...it means paying twice and what's more holding down a job in the current climate is stressful enough without it taking me over an hour and two busses to get to an from work.

i daresay you work from home and have a nice 40k+PA job..its the 'little people' like myself that have to worry about public transport and not clocking in late.

Cauliflowerear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> The 12 is

> > iconic too.

>

> Iconic? No it isnt, catch yourself on. Its just

> another bus that hardly anyone outside of East

> Dulwich really cares about. Once you are a few

> stops up the road to Peckham, there are loads of

> other buses going the same way you can jump on,

> which is probably exactly why its getting canned.


Actually 12 goes via Camberwell whilst the 63s, 78s and 343s don't.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just saw a no.12 going South down Lordship

> Lane.

> Is it re-routed as part of the proposed changes ?

> (apols if I've missed something)


Either the drivers been to Megan's on route or the bus is in the way to the start point at the library 🤔

Just on this idea of paying twice - hopper fares mean that you can get on unlimited busses within 1 hour and only pay once. It has actually really helped with bus travel for me, especially on routes like vauxhall to ED - means can take a 36 and then change at Camberwell for the multiple options there for example.



NewWave Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cauliflowerear Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > The 12 is

> > > iconic too.

> >

> > Iconic? No it isnt, catch yourself on. Its just

> > another bus that hardly anyone outside of East

> > Dulwich really cares about. Once you are a few

> > stops up the road to Peckham, there are loads

> of

> > other buses going the same way you can jump on,

> > which is probably exactly why its getting

> canned.

>

> No everyone wants to have to change busses to get

> to work...it means paying twice and what's more

> holding down a job in the current climate is

> stressful enough without it taking me over an hour

> and two busses to get to an from work.

> i daresay you work from home and have a nice

> 40k+PA job..its the 'little people' like myself

> that have to worry about public transport and not

> clocking in late.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s not great, but this only happens when a business is in trouble and is facing bankruptcy. The landlords are free to say no. The restructuring will often then have to be approved by a High Court judge, so it’s not a total gun-to-the head. It does upset landlords quite a bit though, because if the business does go under, they’ll likely not see any pay out. So they often feel under pressure to comply. 
    • "Sitting around doing job related things". Do you mean sitting and doing their jobs? "have you had your COVID jabs?" Perhaps instead of spending your time on here insulting other posters, in this case me, you would be more effectively employed contacting the practice management with a detailed description of exactly what you say you saw and when. And then see what they say. You have made a lot of assumptions with presumably absolutely no idea what those people's jobs are or when their break times are. I am not defending the practice, which seems to have some problems  I just don't like seeing people who aren't here to defend themselves being publicly attacked by someone who apparently doesn't actually know what those people were doing and why.
    • Relatively recently, they employed a couple of young people on front desk work they were excellent. I don’t know if they’re still there. And yes, they may be doing something on their computers that’s important but when you see  people queuing and no one appearing for many minutes the system seems inefficient.  Some simple changes could make a big difference.  But those changes would have to come from management rather than individual workers choosing to jump up and help. 
    • I'm happy not seeing a GP face to face.  I had WhatsApp video appointments a couple of years ago,which ended up with me being rightly sent to Tommies A and E.  I see nurses from time to time at TJ, I always have a good laugh with both them and the blood test people.  I see the practice nurse at FH from time to time and it feels like visiting an old friend. I'm not sure whether social media has made us a more negative nation, or it just feels this way due to some of you who post on this forum.  The majority of posts in ED matters and on the transport thread are complaints  How would you define lazy and useless?  There is a spectrum of productivity, and of customer service.  Some excel at one or both, but I'm not sure at what point workers drop below an acceptable level.  When I am unhappy I will complain to an organisation. Some respond better than others.  One of my first posts over a decade was to complain about a local shop.  It's a funny anecdote which is essentially a "Ok you don't want my money so I'll go and spend many 100s of pounds at a different company" but I regret not dealing directly with the shop rather than getting pointless revenge many years later.  Still won't use the shop though.        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...