Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No, you're a loser if you scale the Ritzy's billboard and misspell the slogan you're trying to impress the media with. And yes, your impotent bitterness is showcased for all to see if you fail to live-up to the promise of celebrating her death. Because if their weren't any witnesses or documented evidence of your celebration, it was as flaccid as all the venomous posturing so many failed to deliver on. Perhaps you'd like to post evidence of your own little celebration, if any actually occurred.



PS. I'm not a Jehovah's Witness.

"...her informed detractors' hesitant cowardice when presented with the opportunity to actually celebrate her death"


This is ridiculous. I imagine that many of those 'informed detractors' who criticized her have evolved beyond the Stone Age thrashing of dead corpses with sticks.


Do you ever feel that the world has passed you by Vicanna? ;-)

"And yes, your impotent bitterness is showcased for all to see if you fail to live-up to the promise of celebrating her death"


surely this is purest circular logic.

Isn't the more likely scenario that most people, even detractors, are thoroughly bored of the whole thing and watching The Village on iPlayer?

"Isn't the more likely scenario that most people, even detractors, are thoroughly bored of the whole thing and watching The Village on iPlayer?"


Perhaps. I suppose Thatcher's death is annalogous to the arrival of an actual fascist in the form of Paolo Di Canio. People had got so thoroughly tired of the constant howl of "fascist" over the years that they didn't really know how to react when confronted by the real deal. The same could be said of Thatcher's death. Her detractors may have got so used to impressing upon each other and anyone within earshot how they'll dance in the streets when she dies, that they were stunned into inaction when it actually happened. Despite the losers I've already mentioned, that seems to have been the case.

"Isn't the more likely scenario that most people, even detractors, are thoroughly bored of the whole thing and watching The Village on iPlayer?"


Perhaps. I suppose Thatcher's death is analogous to the arrival of an actual fascist in the form of Paolo Di Canio. People had got so thoroughly tired of the constant howl of "fascist" over the years that they didn't really know how to react when confronted by the real deal. The same could be said of Thatcher's death. Her detractors may have got so used to impressing upon each other and anyone within earshot how they'll dance in the streets when she dies, that they were stunned into inaction when it actually happened. Despite the losers I've already mentioned, that seems to have been the case.

E-dealer, I hope that you and Owen Jones are aware that the UK received an IMF bailout in 1976, three years prior to Thatcher taking office? I don't know about you, but IMF bailouts are fairly indicative of a really, really dire economy. How many IMF bailouts were applied for during Thatcher's tenure, exactly?

It doesn't T.E.D


The stupidity of his subheading says it all:


"We are in the midst of the third great economic collapse since the Second World War: all three have taken place since Thatcherism launched its great crusade"


Owen Jones wasn't even born until 1984, he is a trade union researcher and a socialist activist. He's barely more than a student union fist pumper.


As a result of his desperately limited life experience he has no recollection of the 3 day weeks, the power cuts, the collapse of industry under the purview of the rapacious left wing crusades of the unions.


This country has never been on its knees to the extent that it was in the mid 70s.


In short, he's a teenage dick with an agenda, who tells lies to get headlines.

I think the only 'obvious' thing about that article was a capacity for astonishing historical revisionism, and a willingness to embody the vicissitudes of the global economy in one individual.


It doesn't shock me.


My father was a lifelong labour supporter from a blue collar Manchester family. He voted Conservative to both elect and retain Maggie.


Maggie didn't create the social changes of the 80s, the nation did, and they did it because the alternatives were worse.


Maggie didn't shut down British heavy industry, that's quite simply stupid. British industry was destroyed by globalization. We had globalization because we wanted Japanese televisions and international travel, not because Maggie made it.


You can say that 'Maggie didn't save northern communities' but in many northern communities 70% of employment is still public sector. That's about all a government can do, it can't do anything else.


Do you know at one point the government owned all the pubs in Carlisle, Thomas Cook and Pickfords Removals?


How stupid is that? The governments arranges holidays and moving house???


This twattish attribution of the downside of our national social choices is pathetic. It doesn't surprise me, because it happened to Blair.


You know why Blair went to war in Iraq? He went to war for oil. He went to war for oil because the nation wouldn't accept anything else.


All the mewling and puking about it is grand scale hypocrisy.


The most depressing thing about Britain during this period of national decay is the habit of the British to sit in their own mess kidding themselves it wasn't their fault, pillorying other people for their downfall.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...