Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To answer the question - banks don't 'see' the act of cloning (or it wouldn't work), but their security algorithms pick up unusual usage activity, which a cloned card would demonstrate (i.e. close to simultaneous transactions geographically separated, unusual purchases etc. etc.)

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...but their

> security algorithms pick up unusual usage

> activity, which a cloned card would demonstrate

> (i.e. close to simultaneous transactions

> geographically separated, unusual purchases etc.

> etc.)


That's the theory but unfortunately, in my experience, this often doesn't work as expected. On two separate occasions, albeit several years ago, whilst driving in London (and thereby paying the Congestion Charge via Autopay on my credit card) I was apparently also in Bangkok paying for some rather large hotel bills! And yet, on another two occasions when making substantial (but not unusual) payments in a particular shop, my card was incorrectly blocked. I hope the AI has learned from its mistakes since then.

That's the theory but unfortunately, in my experience, this often doesn't work as expected.


The only card cloning I've had has been picked up quickly (even before the bank paid out to the merchant) - and the algorithms are getting better, but of course different issuers use different security algorithms and staff their security centres differently - some are 24 hour - some use their AI IT to immediately block transactions and then only review the machine decision during 'office' hours. It would be possible (in the case you quoted) that an authorised user (spouse?) was driving your car in London whilst you were travelling in Bangkok on business - in which case blocking either transaction would have been more than an annoyance. I've had something similar - luckily my card issuer put a hold on the transactions (not the card) until they could clarify that the transactions were kosher or not. Sometimes banks can put a temporary block on a card and then clear it if transactions are seen as 'correct' - but some issuer's processes require a complete card re-issue once a perceived problem has arisen. It's always a good idea to carry a couple of cards in case that happens to the one you're using.

Two new posters, both created at pretty much the same time, both have made a couple of innocuous but irrelevant comments on other threads, then one resurrects an old thread and the other post spam links. This is about the fourth or fifth time this week (different posters, different threads). It's spam, just a bit more ingeniously done.


User Profile : JoeIskor

Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Posts: 5

Date Registered: 04/07/2019 09:19

Last Activity: 11/07/2019 09:38


ser Profile : Kleeeniks

Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Posts: 4

Date Registered: 04/07/2019 08:45

Last Activity: 11/07/2019 09:59

@penguin68

Yep, that's a fair point. In my cases the card issuer was perhaps unlucky enough to get it "wrong" from my perspective on four occasions. Where my transactions (not the card as I perhaps misled you earlier) were blocked I did indeed have a trusty alternative to use to save myself from a potentially embarrassing situation.


Anyway, perhaps this thread can be laid to rest once again... for a while at least :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...