Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My Interest in this was sparked by Last Night's Feedback.


Words that are now completely misused. I want educating..


The word that FB discussed was


EPICENTRE. It does not mean the centre of something but if correctly used to describe the epicentre of an earth quake would be describing the point at Ground level where the earth quake has maximum effect.



Any more anyone?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31274-dieing-words/
Share on other sites

Is there some criteria to this, at what point does misused become meaning changed over time, think 'gay' for instance.


Acronym would be another, it's generally conflated with the hypernym 'initialism'. An acronym is an initialism said as a word, like SCUBA, rather than letters such as CID (See Eye Dee).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31274-dieing-words/#findComment-635255
Share on other sites

Which neatly brings us back to my question, when does common usage overrule incorrect usage?


All dictionaries now acknowledge the common usage of enormity, there's a quite clear etymological path for one to segue to the other for instance, and I'm already prepared to accept defeat on trope even though that's a very recent import from the states.


Ooh there's another, I'm seeing segway instead of segue a fair bit recently, that really bring on the wet clowns mantra

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31274-dieing-words/#findComment-635309
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Huggers, please can you share the fabulous chiropodist's details?  Huggers, I think podiatrists are the same and podiatrists, pretty much. Why aren't you sticking with the chiropractor, out of interest, if they seem to think the problem is more posture-related than solely (sorry) down to the feet? 
    • Thankyou! Originally I had a private referral ( husband had health insurance at time) and so worn insoles for years but I still wear my shoes down in one place at a ridiculous rate! A fab chiropodist agrees with posture is everything stance. Experienced cobbler says some it ain’t right and I’m over corrected. 
    • I've booked a session with Elmcourt Clinic in West Norwood, recommended by our daughter. A two-week wait for the slot, though.  https://www.elmcourtclinic.co.uk/
    • I don't know everyone else's foot problems are, but I have classic and apparently quite bad deformity - bunions, pain etc. I went to the Woodware Rd practice a few years ago and got orthotics for the not inconsiderable price of £600.  The team there seems very nice but, now that I am experiencing a new type of foot pain, I'm wondering if I've been doing it all wrong these years with supportive trainers and insoles. I'm beginning to realise (seems obvious now) that, if I want to cure my foot pain, maybe I need to change the way I walk, and my posture etc. And also, maybe I need to try barefoot shoes, to build muscle where there's been no need prior, because shoes have been doing all the supporting.  I've been educating myself with Helen Hall and Lawrence van Lingen and addressing my gait seems like a more organic way to solve the problem. Podiatrists will convince you that orthotics and / or surgery are the only way to go, but look up reddit forums and you'll find countless people saying they 'cured' their bunions with barefoot walking / shoes / and exercises.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...