Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My Interest in this was sparked by Last Night's Feedback.


Words that are now completely misused. I want educating..


The word that FB discussed was


EPICENTRE. It does not mean the centre of something but if correctly used to describe the epicentre of an earth quake would be describing the point at Ground level where the earth quake has maximum effect.



Any more anyone?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31274-dieing-words/
Share on other sites

Is there some criteria to this, at what point does misused become meaning changed over time, think 'gay' for instance.


Acronym would be another, it's generally conflated with the hypernym 'initialism'. An acronym is an initialism said as a word, like SCUBA, rather than letters such as CID (See Eye Dee).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31274-dieing-words/#findComment-635255
Share on other sites

Which neatly brings us back to my question, when does common usage overrule incorrect usage?


All dictionaries now acknowledge the common usage of enormity, there's a quite clear etymological path for one to segue to the other for instance, and I'm already prepared to accept defeat on trope even though that's a very recent import from the states.


Ooh there's another, I'm seeing segway instead of segue a fair bit recently, that really bring on the wet clowns mantra

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31274-dieing-words/#findComment-635309
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree with your sentiment, however you are mistaken about the Dulwich Estate. Their sole purpose is to make as much money as possible to give to the schools they support, as well as the almshouses and other historical buildings. They do not care about social housing (except subsidised housing for teachers of the schools), refreshing the area, low-rent studios, charming but affordable pub, etc. While they are a charity, their purpose is very constrained/focused and whatever they do with this site, it has to make money for them. It's not that they're being nasty or stingy, it's just what their statutes tell them they have to do. Note that I am not defending them, but knowing the above helps understand why they do what they do, even if sometimes it seems to go against the wishes of the local community. They are not answerable to the local community, and their only oversight is the charity commission and the courts. And of course, like all bureaucracies (esp those with limited oversight), they look after themselves very well. 
    • Posting for a friend. Missing from The Gardens.   Amazingly found after 2 days just as I posted.  My powers are better than I thought!!!!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...