Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A hypothetical...


A person has the same education that everyone gets, and works hard to save a little cash, and then invests the whole lot (mortgage and pension) in creating an iPad app.


I'm going to use 'she' for brevity.


She has no specialist education in app creation, she was funded by the government to get an arts degree that so many people have.


She paid for her own education in tech development and business competence.


She spies a market opportunity for an App and plows everything she has into creating it. She employs a dozen people at market rates with appropriate benefits and perks (paid for out of profit). Many of them, except the most junior, have shares.


The App is ?1, she sells 3,000,000 copies for a net income of ?2.1m in the first year.


She paid ?1.5m in total in development costs, but every month she flirted with bankruptcy.


All the risk was hers - her employees got paid, whilst she worried about finances and ate baked beans.


Clearly, very soon, she's going to make a few quid. Enter the 'elite' zone.


She took all the risks, sacrificed her future and security, on a project where only 1 in a 100 are successful.


At what point does she become a rich bitch, sucking the nation dry?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31335-redistribution-of-wealth/
Share on other sites

But more seriously who is accusing who of sucking what nation dry


If "she" starts to make a profit and pays her tax on said profit where is the problem


She might think that the 99 other people who sacrificed as much as she did but weren't successful shouldn't be condemned to a life of misery and a basic state support is there for them. As long as the winners pay their taxes. After all she is winning

Nah, it's not me.


It was an interesting outcome of one of the spreadsheets of a client.


I only ever get development fees - same as a salary.


BUT within 3 years, their income dwarfs the wealth pattern of an average middle class. They become one of the 1%.


Have they ripped off society?

I can't see how they are ripping off society. Good luck to 'em


But it's when some of them look at their tax bill and not their net income and think its they who are losing out I start to get annoyed


When she was young she would have been aware of the state position on tax and started her risky venture in full knowledge of said contract. She would have paid good money to ensure she got to that level early on i'll bet. So she makes it. Well done, and now the cycle continues

What is she due?


She is due what she expected when she grew up in a society which taxed at 40% or 60% or whatever it is / was


She looked at that and thought "if I have an idea good enough and work hard enough and Get Lucky I will be minted even after all the taxes"


And she gets to where she wants to be. What is she due????


She didn't employ people out of altruism. She needed the labour. She wouldn't have succeeded without it


She isn't due anything


She is where she planned and hoped to be

What a marvellous thought, in times of great stress the ultra rational H indulges every Internet whim led fantasy!!


Talking of which I gather the CTs are already accusing the FBI of this one. Way to prefigure the 'official' narrative by inventing your own before anybody has *any* information at all.

I don't have any bankrolled dreams in this context, I've made cash as a worker, not as an owner to date. I lost money owning stuff.


It's interesting how aggressive your response has been?


I asked a question that we asked together with friends, and they wondered what UK people would say.


The SJ thing is about conformity?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...