Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thinking about:


a) The growing food crisis in the developing world, largely due to unfair tariffs and subsidies plus food production switching to bio-fuels

b) The oil and gas companies once again reaping record profits as consumer energy costs continue to rise (and fuel inflation)

c) The Governor of the BoE speaking out against the excesses and short sighted behaviour of the city


Is this the acceptable face of Capitalism if we're to retain global domination of our economy, culture and way of life or is there another way?

Fat pigs feeding frenzy with faces stuffed in our trough while fu(king us all up the @rse telling us to be grateful for consumer choice of chemically adulterated food and sweat shop produced clothes and other crap we are told we need to be fashionable/normal/better than the chavs while the world and economy goes to sh!t.

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Britain's banks are forecast to report bumper

> profits of more than ?42bn for 2007 despite being

> forced to stomach losses caused by the credit

> crunch, yet many homeowners will only have

> repossession of their family home to look forward

> to.


Along the same lines: http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/business/consumers-to-link-oil-company-profits-and-petrol-prices-any-day-now-20080429910/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...