Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't agree that take-outs shouldn't be responsible for the litter on surrouding streets. It's not a chav thing, I think it applies equally to Seacow and SlippyChicken, as it does to KebabSlop. It should also apply to Wrigley's and Fags-u-like for sponsorship of street cleaners.


Clearing up after the punters is a cost-of-doing-business for restaurateurs, and if they choose to use the high street as their dining-area they don't get to duck the clear-up costs.


It would take no more than an hour to cover the roads within 400 yards and pick up the mess; at whatever today's min wage is that's not exactly breaking the bank. Get the cleaner in an hour earlier.

What I can't figure out is why some of the letters in Lick'n chick'n are missing and some aren't. I sat there across the road waiting for my bus trying to figure it out.


I also was looking at the sign wondering about the name. I mean is it me or is there something vaguely R rated about the name?


Scylla

I wondered if they just got it wrong and meant it to be " lickin' " instead of " lick'n " which is frankly preposterous, but they didn't know how to spell it


it does however inspire me to say it out loud in an equally preposterous voice every time I walk past


does Charybdis lurk in Kebab and Wine would you say, or perhaps if you were navigating the tricky line between the dangers of chavdom (Lick'n Chick'n) and clamphamdom, she may be found in the White Stuff. Have I stretched this analogy too far?

clive3300 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why are clearly improving standards of goods and

> services - in line with generally rising

> prosperity - such a problem? Sure, some of the

> shops can be silly and overpriced, but dont go

> there.


I wouldnt call opening a shop selling overpriced rock hard

poncy bread with weird seeds in them an improvent to the

the standards of ed.


Better if the dodgy pavements were sorted out they look a mess




>

> I have been repeatedly told that East Dulwich was

> pretty awful 10-15 years ago - cab drivers wouldnt

> even take you there etc.

>

> I dont understand why many people on here seem to

> want to hold on to crummy, threadbare pubs and

> chicken shops selling crap food, semi-derelict,

> ?1, 2nd hand or vacant shops etc: as still exist

> in most of SE London?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes..that may be the case but membership STARTING at £115 a month is still unafforable for many. Council gyms also have a large range of equipment and I had a  PT at Dulwich leisure centre when I was in Full Time employment who was incredible and even kept in contact during lockdown giving me a program I could do at home and checking in weekly at no charge or personal gain for herself. I dont doubt that Fit For may be a good gym (Its been in situ long enough so must be doing something right) However the cost of membership means it is affordable for the few not the many. If I could afford that kind of fee I would rather get a train to Canary Wharf and go to Virgin active where theres a pool and incredible classes and facilities 
    • This sounds great 👍 
    • We found a red TREK bike yesterday that had clearly been stolen and dumped. Would love to reunite it with its owner. Get in touch if you know whose it is.
    • Hey, I am interested. I had started a club last year however everyone slowly dropped off but I am always up for morning runs and some evening runs too.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...