Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone!


I think the real problem with page 3 is that it provides such an easy way for idiots to intimidate, harass and bully women and girls. It's so easy for a group of boys to buy the paper and wave page 3 around in front of girls to embarrass them that I'm sure it leads to more bullying and harassment than there would be if it didn't exist. Using page 3 against women like this requires no effort or imagination at all, and the fact that it exists in a newspaper makes it seem ok.


I'm so convinced that this is the real problem, and that it's nothing to do with prudery, that I created a website to collect the stories of women who have had page 3 used against them. It's here if anybody wants to have a look, or to add a story. I hope it might help to sway some opinions!


http://www.page3stories.org


Some of the stories are really sad. When I started the website I assumed that most of them would be about unpleasant incidents in public, but what's come in so far is worse than I imagined - a lot of them seem to be about the cumulative effects on mental health or physical health of long-term bullying and abuse, including child abuse, within families. These are stories that aren't getting told anywhere else. Of course there will still be horrible people in the world if we get rid of page 3, but why continue to provide these photos that make it so easy for them to continue with, and above all to excuse, this way of treating women, because the photos are in a newspaper which means that "nobody else minds"?


There is a demo this Sunday 17th November in London to mark the 43rd birthday of page 3. Details here: http://nomorepage3.org/news/page-3-43rd-birthday-protests/

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...

You mean you don't live in ED?


Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Coop tells the bunch of prudes to sod off.

>

> http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/a

> ug/13/page-3-co-operative-group

>

> If there was a co-op near me, I'd head down there

> and buy something. Though not the Sun, obviously.

TBH I don't have a big problem with lads mags (apart from the fact that they're rubbish). They're not pretending to be something they're not, or masquerading as "news". I've no particular urge to see the latest Hollyoaks starlet in a bikini, but I don't hold a grudge against those who do (and get reviews of the new Kasabian album and Jason Statham movie thrown into the mix).

What could be more natural than catching-up with the latest from Gaza (in large print, no more than three lines) - and then feasting your eyes on a massive pair of tits?


It's not doing any harm and if you say it is - you're probably a poofter or a lezza.


eh lads?!


am I right OR AM I RIGHT?!

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The old guard east dulwich activist intelligentsia have been priced out. And they now live in Surrey,

> Sussex, Bromley and Whitstable. Raging and frothing from the benign suburbs.


In my case, South Ealing/Northfields way. It's very much like East Dulwich, but with a tube station.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MrBen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The old guard east dulwich activist

> intelligentsia have been priced out. And they now

> live in Surrey,

> > Sussex, Bromley and Whitstable. Raging and

> frothing from the benign suburbs.

>

> In my case, South Ealing/Northfields way. It's

> very much like East Dulwich, but with a tube

> station.



You left out Lewes Mr Ben, it's a rising strong on the EDF exodus trail


I personally have a hide-out in Sydenham woods (sounds creepy I know)

> You left out Lewes Mr Ben, it's a rising strong on

> the EDF exodus trail



I've been to Lewes a few times and no there's doubt its a nice family town with interesting history of pope burning, good beer and high speed rail links. But have you seen the price of a house there?


If I ever decide to head to woop woop I want to trade in my very average south london terrace for a 6 bedder, swimming pool and a few acres at least and plenty other options in stockbroker belt /Kent offer that.


Sorry - not about the Sun.... Can we get back to naked breasts now please?

don't write off the building-a-mansion-for-?22.36p-in-quite-literally-the-arse-end-of-nowhere_abroad option until you've tried it!!


Of course naked breasts are frowned upon round here, mainly because of the instinctive reaction to frown upon everything, it's all that excess guilt...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So you are justifying building on the green belt, in Londons case "the lungs of London" which will causes harm to natures ability to turn co2 into o2? 
    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...