Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone!


I think the real problem with page 3 is that it provides such an easy way for idiots to intimidate, harass and bully women and girls. It's so easy for a group of boys to buy the paper and wave page 3 around in front of girls to embarrass them that I'm sure it leads to more bullying and harassment than there would be if it didn't exist. Using page 3 against women like this requires no effort or imagination at all, and the fact that it exists in a newspaper makes it seem ok.


I'm so convinced that this is the real problem, and that it's nothing to do with prudery, that I created a website to collect the stories of women who have had page 3 used against them. It's here if anybody wants to have a look, or to add a story. I hope it might help to sway some opinions!


http://www.page3stories.org


Some of the stories are really sad. When I started the website I assumed that most of them would be about unpleasant incidents in public, but what's come in so far is worse than I imagined - a lot of them seem to be about the cumulative effects on mental health or physical health of long-term bullying and abuse, including child abuse, within families. These are stories that aren't getting told anywhere else. Of course there will still be horrible people in the world if we get rid of page 3, but why continue to provide these photos that make it so easy for them to continue with, and above all to excuse, this way of treating women, because the photos are in a newspaper which means that "nobody else minds"?


There is a demo this Sunday 17th November in London to mark the 43rd birthday of page 3. Details here: http://nomorepage3.org/news/page-3-43rd-birthday-protests/

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...

You mean you don't live in ED?


Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Coop tells the bunch of prudes to sod off.

>

> http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/a

> ug/13/page-3-co-operative-group

>

> If there was a co-op near me, I'd head down there

> and buy something. Though not the Sun, obviously.

TBH I don't have a big problem with lads mags (apart from the fact that they're rubbish). They're not pretending to be something they're not, or masquerading as "news". I've no particular urge to see the latest Hollyoaks starlet in a bikini, but I don't hold a grudge against those who do (and get reviews of the new Kasabian album and Jason Statham movie thrown into the mix).

What could be more natural than catching-up with the latest from Gaza (in large print, no more than three lines) - and then feasting your eyes on a massive pair of tits?


It's not doing any harm and if you say it is - you're probably a poofter or a lezza.


eh lads?!


am I right OR AM I RIGHT?!

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The old guard east dulwich activist intelligentsia have been priced out. And they now live in Surrey,

> Sussex, Bromley and Whitstable. Raging and frothing from the benign suburbs.


In my case, South Ealing/Northfields way. It's very much like East Dulwich, but with a tube station.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MrBen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The old guard east dulwich activist

> intelligentsia have been priced out. And they now

> live in Surrey,

> > Sussex, Bromley and Whitstable. Raging and

> frothing from the benign suburbs.

>

> In my case, South Ealing/Northfields way. It's

> very much like East Dulwich, but with a tube

> station.



You left out Lewes Mr Ben, it's a rising strong on the EDF exodus trail


I personally have a hide-out in Sydenham woods (sounds creepy I know)

> You left out Lewes Mr Ben, it's a rising strong on

> the EDF exodus trail



I've been to Lewes a few times and no there's doubt its a nice family town with interesting history of pope burning, good beer and high speed rail links. But have you seen the price of a house there?


If I ever decide to head to woop woop I want to trade in my very average south london terrace for a 6 bedder, swimming pool and a few acres at least and plenty other options in stockbroker belt /Kent offer that.


Sorry - not about the Sun.... Can we get back to naked breasts now please?

don't write off the building-a-mansion-for-?22.36p-in-quite-literally-the-arse-end-of-nowhere_abroad option until you've tried it!!


Of course naked breasts are frowned upon round here, mainly because of the instinctive reaction to frown upon everything, it's all that excess guilt...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...