Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst their appointment system leaves me cold, I have always found the receptionists extremely helpful and accommodating. I recently wanted to make a non-urgent appt for a particular day of the week and their diary hadn't been opened up far enough to schedule it. The receptionist made a note of my request and called me the day the diary was extended, so I didn't miss the slot.
I managed to get a same day appointment last Monday - I had to ring for about 10 minutes but got an afternoon appointment, as requested. I have seen the doctor (Dr Wong?) a few times and he is very thorough and doesn't rush you through the appointment. I do get frustrated by the engaged phone and the fact I generally have to get a same day appointment rather than being able to book a non-urgent one but overall the care I have had from the surgery since it opened has been good. I should add that I have had been to the surgery for a range of illnesses - and a few health scares - over the years so I have been a fairly regular customer.
I find their relationship with Lloyds on express prescriptions quite flawed. Almost every time I go to pick up a prescription it is late or has gone missing, with both sides blaming each other (i.e. DMC saying it was filled and picked up by Lloyds, and Lloyds claiming it hadn't been done by DMC). I'm quite sick of it. I've also never been told about the onsite pharmacy which is a bit annoying as on several occasions (due to their cock up) I've had children and myself run out of important medication. Infuriating. Agree there are a couple of nice receptionists and individual doctors but the overall system isn't working, for us anyway.
Yes Belle I too have had no end of problems with the dmc-lloyds process. To the point where it has had me reduced to tears. The final drop was when the pharmacist accused me of telling fibs..I have now cancelled it (and made a formal complaint)and have set up the same service with sainsburys pharmacy and so far I cant fault them. Not one hiccup so far. Worth a try?

I have an automatic repeat prescription with DMC-Lloyds and have had no problems at all with it.


Just picked it up at Lloyds yesterday in fact, and it was there on the day specified two months ago.


Must admit I did once have an issue (with different medication) when DMC were blaming Lloyds and vice versa, but that was a long time ago and was a one-off.

I also never get my prescriptions sent to lloyds any more, I had 3 issues, found DMC to be helpful and lloyds pretty awful.


The time that made me give up on them was them not having my (very common) medication in stock - apparently they had stopped stocking it. I always pick up my repeats and go to either of the ones on lordship lane now.


Re DMC, I also find it shocking that its so hard to get an appt unless you wait 3 weeks but having said that when I have needed a doctor quickly for my son they have been really good at squeezing us in.

It's a shiny APMS (private provider) building, but other than one excellent doctor, my experiences there (and my girlfriend's) were always pretty terrible. Doctors that are embarrased by human bodies, shocking failure to understand very simple issues (demonstrated when I got to the physio and heard what had been written on the referral) and an appaling appointments system. I work for the British Medical Association so I understand how these things work - this practice will get paid (in broad terms) based on the number of patients on their list - hence why they clearly have way too many registered patients and it is so difficult to get an appointment.

1983groke

I am a physio and tbh irrelevant of the Drs level of knowledge ie GP / reg/cons what they write on physio referrals is terrible! Lazy? Or just lack of respect for the knowledge of other healthcare professionals? Not sure...

However you are correct about GP contracts... Though I believe another problem with the contracts are that they can't close their lists for short periods. Meant to stop them declining patients that they didn't want but they had minimal time periods they could close for. This has had the unintented effect that thy don't close them at all and end up oversubscribed. They daren't close them in case their numbers go down too far. They are at fault because they may be following the contract but not the moral and ethical duty they have.

My experiences are varied. In the past excellent, cause for complaint due to not investigating a condition the doctor himself suggested that I had and more recently poor / non existent appts. I'm very capable of getting what I need, but being an articulate middle class forceful individual should NOT be the way to get basic healthcare.

I think I may try another chemist then, though longer term will probably switch GPs anyway. I've had prescriptions which weren't on the express system with Lloyds but which still haven't been done (i.e. it was DMC's fault) - despite having allowed more than the minimum 48 hours etc, and that's just inexcusable. Once, ok - but 3 or 4 times in as many months is ridiculous. In fairness, my husband sent a complaint in and got a very swift and detailed response from the practise manager. Like you midivydale I've been on the brink of tears at times, it's extremely stressful not being able to get medication you know your child needs, especially when you have jumped through all the appropriate hoops.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...