Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just thought I'd share this appalling account of extreme cycle hatred that sums up why I want to challenge some motorists' sense of entitlement and prejudice towards cyclists whenever I get the chance:


http://road.cc/content/news/84212-norwich-police-seek-driver-who-tweeted-about-collision-cyclist

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32457-dangerous-drivers/
Share on other sites

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dick cyclists are annoying, dick motorists are

> dangerous.


Just because they are not travelling at 'speed' does not mean that they can not be a danger to themselves and others.


ETA: I am not anti cycling - I would LOVE to cycle to work but do not feel confident enough to for the exact reason I just stated above.

Oh Come on LD, just because a bike isn't a car, an idiot on a bike can still hurt people pretty bad if they hit them at speed, and more to the point, they can cause accidents.


I'm not a motorist or a regular cyclist, but as a pedestrian, I've come closer to being hit by cyclists than cars on a number of occasions (usually when they're going around stationary vehicles at top speed).


This is like people slagging off all mothers with buggies just because a few are selfish idiots.

I think cyclists should be banned from dangerous inner city trunk roads. LL is a prime example. Buses, lorries, vans and cars all competing in a small space with pedestrians crossing sometimes without due care and attention. Cyclists just add to this pressure, so how about putting cycle routes along back roads and banning them from bigger roads. Just a thought.


Louisa.

It's the hatred of cyclists by motorists that is what worries me.


The incident in the first article is a hate crime by a stupid woman using her car as a weapon against a cyclist in my opinion and it is this kind of dangerous attitude to cyclists that I want people to question.


I am going to invest in a helmet cam to report the dangerous drivers I encounter everyday and the abuse I receive when I try to pull them up for endangering my life.


Why should motorists be allowed to get away with this kind of behaviour on a daily basis without it being challenged?

But it works both ways LD......look at this case for example......


http://www.cravenherald.co.uk/news/10349601.Cyclist_found_guilty_of_assaulting_van_driver/?ref=rss


People lose their tempers on both sides.


You are not the police. If you choose to challenge every driver you feel isn't driving to a standard you set, then you are putting yourself at risk of being abused and will find little sympathy from the Police, unless the driver has caused an actual accident (and failed to stop) of course. As a lawyer you should know this.

Just to lighten proceedings a little heres a joke I found.


The other day on a ride, I was speeding down a narrow, twisting, mountain road. Then along comes a man who was driving very slowly uphill toward me, honking his horn and shouting at me.


"PIG! PIG!!" he yelled. "PIG! PIG!!"


So I flipped him the finger and shouted back some things I dare not repeat as I buzzed by him.


Still thinking about this awful man and his shouting, I turned the corner and promptly collided with a pig.


Louisa.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:


>

> You are not the police. If you choose to challenge

> every driver you feel isn't driving to a standard

> you set, then you are putting yourself at risk of

> being abused and will find little sympathy from

> the Police, unless the driver has caused an actual

> accident (and failed to stop) of course. As a

> lawyer you should know this.



Actually that is not correct. If you see someone commit an offence you have the right to make a citizen's arrest. This is what security guards' and other non-police arrests are based on.


If someone is committing the offence of dangerous driving, putting my life in danger, I have the right to challenge them.

And because I know none of the law abiding EDF motorists want to breach the Highway Code, I thought I'd post this so you know what you are expected to do when overtaking a cyclist:



The Highway Code Rule 163 states that you should


Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so

not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake

use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick sideways glance if necessary into the blind spot area and then start to move out

not assume that you can simply follow a vehicle ahead which is overtaking; there may only be enough room for one vehicle

move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in

take extra care at night and in poor visibility when it is harder to judge speed and distance

give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road

only overtake on the left if the vehicle in front is signalling to turn right, and there is room to do so

stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you may pass on the left

give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car (see Rules 211-215)

More help for all you caring motorists, listed under the section Vulnerable Road Users along with horse riders:


211

It is often difficult to see motorcyclists and cyclists, especially when they are coming up from behind, coming out of junctions, at roundabouts, overtaking you or filtering through traffic. Always look out for them before you emerge from a junction; they could be approaching faster than you think. When turning right across a line of slow-moving or stationary traffic, look out for cyclists or motorcyclists on the inside of the traffic you are crossing. Be especially careful when turning, and when changing direction or lane. Be sure to check mirrors and blind spots carefully.

212

When passing motorcyclists and cyclists, give them plenty of room (see Rules 162 to 167). If they look over their shoulder it could mean that they intend to pull out, turn right or change direction. Give them time and space to do so.

213

Motorcyclists and cyclists may suddenly need to avoid uneven road surfaces and obstacles such as drain covers or oily, wet or icy patches on the road. Give them plenty of room and pay particular attention to any sudden change of direction they may have to make.

LD, having actually read your two links, I am shocked by the attitudes towards cyclists that are expressed there. The first one, a stupid woman was prepared to injure a human being and then boast about it on twitter, the second a mad old judge is not prepared to give a proper sentence to someone who killed a granny who was on a bike.

Unbelievable!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
    • Well according to a newspaper article, Gail’s is opening 10 shops in London,,, yup Dulwich is named 10/5 I seem to recall with others in London opening at 7 am…!, Guess that is to capture workers coming off all night shift. Offering free mince pies until they run out.. So very sad to hear about Romeo Jones… been a customer since the opening, any idea where Patrick has gone or details… please pm me.    What is going to be in its place…. Will be around in Jan…umm village is changing….
    • interesting the police said "the car was in demand at the moment" what make/model is that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...