Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I must admit that I have never been in the TCC. From outside it does not appeal to me. Perhaps we will try it one day. We used to go to Mr. Lui's on Lordship Lane but recently have been advised that they do not have food warmers! You order a banquet and expect the food to be kept warm. We have been unhappy on the last three occasions, on the last visit I had a meal accidentally poured down my back. I felt so sorry for the young girl serving.


On the subject of food... We like to go out on a Sunday night for a indian buffet, all restaurants in Lordship Lane advertise 21 items of food for this buffet meal, The Pistachio restaurant is the worst so far only making available to you 14 items, the best is the Surma who had 22 items and then brought to me Spinach and fresh prawns pan fried completely free.


Good Eh.


Regards,


Libra Carr.

Can I request that adults who post, stop using the word 'tummy', it's silly, not to say slightly creepy.


I don't usually explain why I edit, but I thought on reflection my original post could be construed as being at the very least mean-spirited, if not downright offensive.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I request that adults who post, stop using the

> word 'tummy', it's silly, not to say slightly

> creepy.

>

> I don't usually explain why I edit, but I thought

> on reflection my original post could be construed

> as being at the very least mean-spirited, if not

> downright offensive.


xxxxxx


Eh? Have I missed something here?


Has anyone else spotted the use of the word "tummy"?


:-S

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can I request that adults who post, stop using

> the

> > word 'tummy', it's silly, not to say slightly

> > creepy.

> >

> > I don't usually explain why I edit, but I

> thought

> > on reflection my original post could be

> construed

> > as being at the very least mean-spirited, if

> not

> > downright offensive.

>

> xxxxxx

>

> Eh? Have I missed something here?

>

> Has anyone else spotted the use of the word

> "tummy"?

>

> :-S


Twice on this page. Two times too many as far as I'm concerned.

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Makes my tummy have the colley-wobbles such is my

> angst


Colley-wobbles. Thanks for that one Michael. Another phrase that has no place in the adult lexicon.

I don't know what I'd do without you good people sometimes.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HB, could you please advise whether we are still

> allowed to use the words 'dummy', 'scummy',

> 'slummy', 'scrummy' and 'yummy'?

>

> Many thanks

> Moos

>

> P.S. Also please confirm status of 'crummy'


Not to mention 'mummy'

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HB, could you please advise whether we are still

> allowed to use the words 'dummy', 'scummy',

> 'slummy', 'scrummy' and 'yummy'?

>

> Many thanks

> Moos

>

> P.S. Also please confirm status of 'crummy'


Yes, yes, yes, definitely no and you must be joking.


Crummy? There's no such word. Crumby though is perfectly acceptable.


You're welcome.

Hmm.


Merriam-Webster has 'crumby' as a variant on the usual spelling, and also gives the etymology as ME 'crumme' so think I will stick with crummy.


As for the now-deleted scrummy and yummy I fear their absence may have an injurious effect on the many amateur restaurant reviewers of ED. But thus it is written, and so shall it be.


Thank you, HonaloochieB, Deus Ex Machina.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmm.

>

> Merriam-Webster has 'crumby' as a variant on the

> usual spelling, and also gives the etymology as ME

> 'crumme' so think I will stick with crummy.

>

> As for the now-deleted scrummy and yummy I fear

> their absence may have an injurious effect on the

> many amateur restaurant reviewers of ED. But thus

> it is written, and so shall it be.

>

> Thank you, HonaloochieB, Deus Ex Machina.



You're welcome Moos. My own humble suggestions to replace the words we've decided, with good reason, to get rid of are 'endroolable' and 'lunchy'. Go on, give them a try.


Deus Ex Machina, eh? Terribly flaterring but I'm barely Greek and for the most part not a tragedy.


Love and best wishes.

HonaloochieB, I may have to remove your winged sandals - endroolable? And imagine the confusion were someone to find his lunch insufficiently lunchy. God's bodkin, have you thought this through?


Were it not for your long and credible history of gravely informed statesmanlike pronouncements on this Forum I'd suspect you were jesting, and at our expense too.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Miquel Frothalotforus, take the beam out of your

> own eye.


I know. What's he like?

See, now you've me quoting Ainsley Harrison.

Are there no shallows to which I will not stoop?

Honestly, I'm just a fool for your loving and no mistake.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...