Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is no such thing as "Road Tax". There is vehicle excise duty which is based on the vehicles emission levels to discourage polluting vehicles. The revenue from VED is not specifically used to fund roads nor is it a fee entitling road use.


The cost road maintenance funded out of general taxation and an order of magnitude greater than what raised from VED.


Everyone has the right to use the roads.

Cyclists Should pay Road Tax...


They expect Dedicated Cycle Lanes and these are available

Also Dedicated Cycle Lane Traffic lights. (Usually ignored by Cyclists)

All this costs money..


Who Should pay for these.


Cylists Do also cause Accidents but do not require insurance.

Anyone can jump on a Bicycle with no experiance and reguardless of age.


The whole thing is ridiculous.


DulwichFox

Fox, didn't you read any of the previous posts before you commented?


We all pay for roads out of our general taxes. Vehicle Excise duty is levied according the weight (ability to damage the road) and emmissions. Low/zero emmissions cars pay no vehicle excise duty. So how much do you think bicycles would pay?


I addition, as a tax payer, both central and local, I pay for motorways, public car parks and other vehicle infrastructure that as a cyclists I would not use and which cost hundreds of times more than any cycling infrastructure.


The costs to the NHS from pollution and lard arse drivers, also comes out of my pocket. The cost in terms of climate change is paid by all of us, including cyclists who emit no CO2 by their mode of travel.


So as a cyclist who pays tax, I am subsidising motorists, not the other way round.

I have no real problem with Cyclists using the public roads


But..

Cycle Lanes Are JUST for Cyclists.. For their sole use...


someone needs to pay for them..


I do not Cycle..


Why should I pay for them. ?


LadyDeliah:-- "So as a cyclist who pays tax, I am subsidising motorists, not the other way round."


NO you're not...


To suggest you pay for Public Car Parks... ???


Have you ANY idea how much it costs motorists to use them.

They are Money Pots for Local Authorities..


lard arse drivers .. What does that mean..???

So you Never travel by car..


Yes we all pay Taxes.. Including me..

I pay all the same taxes that you pay.


I drive less than 2,000 miles per year. < 40 miles per week..


Still pay ?200.00 Road Tax. ?400.00 Insurance. ?60.00 MOT per year.

and for parking...


Plus I pay Tax on my petrol.


So you are Not subsidising me.


I do not have children but pay for schools..

So if you have kids, I am subsisising you.


As for Pollution..


Well China has few cars and Millions of Bicycles...

Still one of the most polluted countries on Earth.


There are many more factors involved with pollution other than cars.. so when it comes to NHS costs

think about how you heat your home


That will do for now..


Foxy

You fail to grasp what im saying. Motorways cost many millions to build and msintain as do other motor infrastructure projects from which cyclists are excluded.


Your 'road' tax, does not pay for roads, neither does your insurance (goes to pay for damages and legal fees when you collide with something or someone). Petrol tax and vehicle excise duty don't even touch the costs of building and maintaining motorways and other non-cyclist motorist infrastructure.


Pollution from an increased number of motorised vehicles has been linked to a huge Increase in asthma and other respiratory illnesses, mainly affecting children.


I don't live in China, so their pollution stats are irrelevant.


Lard arses, well it's been proven that car drivers tend to become less active, making unesseary short journeys by car resulting in an increase in all the diseased associated with sedentary lifestyles. Add to that the increased stress due to becoming frustrated by driving on congested roads and motorists are increasing my NGS bill. In comparison, cyclists reduce the demand on the NHS, except when they get mowed down by motorists, of course, because exercise decreases the incidence of our most common illnesses that drain our NHS resources :-)


See, simple really.

How about paying insurance? I've just paid ?536 to have a dent removed from my car caused by a cyclist coming down a one way road and hitting my car with their bike. Spoke to said cyclist at time of incident who told me to drive more carefully and that I was lucky they weren't injured!! Did I have any options to reclaim the money from the cyclist?

glasshalffull Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How about paying insurance? I've just paid ?536 to

> have a dent removed from my car caused by a

> cyclist coming down a one way road and hitting my

> car with their bike. Spoke to said cyclist at time

> of incident who told me to drive more carefully

> and that I was lucky they weren't injured!! Did I

> have any options to reclaim the money from the

> cyclist?


You are perfectly entitled to seek a remedey in the small claims court, as is anyone else who has damage caused to their property by another person in any other situation.


Car insurance is compulsory because damages are likely to be in the thousands, not hundreds of pounds.

In that case they have left the scene of an accident, which is illegal. You must report the accident to the police noting the other party left without leaving details. I doubt anything will happen (unless you have a good description or a photo), but it will at least register the crime.


Section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 requires drivers/ riders to report to a police officer or police station that they have been involved in an accident involving in any of the following;


any personal injury

damage only, where the other driver/ rider did not stop

damage only, where names and addresses were not exchanged with the other driver/ rider/ cyclist and any other owner of property damaged (even if the other driver stopped)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...