Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not sure that they should be given away for

> free. Presumably they are paid for out of public

> funds? It does not seem right that public money

> should be used to subsidise dog owners who won't

> clear up after their dogs at their own initiative.


So dog owners don't pay into public funds then?


Dog owners obtaining the bags are ones that DO clean up after their dogs, why else would they want the bags? Besides, if it encourages more people to pick up that's got to be a good thing.

The council has a street cleaning team dedicated to responding to calls from the public to remove dog mess from pavements, but of course that also comes from the local public purse.


Nappy sacks and poo bags are ideal for the purpose. Most carrier bags are not as many have holes in them to prevent children from suffocating themselves and as such allow faeces to ooze through, which puts many people off using them.

jrussel,


Not sure public funds should be used to clear up broken glass, cigarette butts, used chicken bones, chewing gum (gosh the list is endless) users have not cleared up on their own initiative. You seem fixated on the dog issue in particular. What is your solution?

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SeanMLow was fined ?80 for dropping a cigar butt.

>

> What price for dog turds(?)



dont even go down that road, the thought of sml, whinging on about being fined over a crap is just too much.;-)

Information just available:

DULWICH FUN DOG EVENT @ Goose Green

East Dulwich Road SE22

Saturday 24 May 2008 ? 12pm to 3pm


Guide dogs for the blind ? stall and info about guide dogs

Expert dog handler demonstrations

Micro chipping service

Freebies & treats for your dog

Local dog trainer available for advice and tips on responsible dog ownership


This event has been organised by the Dulwich Community Wardens. To find out more contact them on 020 7525 0051. They have fliers they are distributing. So if you would like to distribute them in your area or give them to people you see offending in some way with their dogs, you might give them one.

jumpinjackflash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Eileen, does the event include a dog show?! My

> mutt lost out to a Ridgeback at the last dog event

> in the Rye - he might fare better this year!


It doesn't look like it, **Guide dogs for the blind, Expert dog handler, Micro chipping, Freebies & treats, Local dog trainer, tips on responsible dog ownership**, but still worth visiting I think. Pity we haven't had more notice so we could have advertised it widely to all those who need some dog education ... But there is still time to get the info out and try to increase the number of owners trained on how to be good owners.

It does seem a little disproportionate that someone should be fined ?80 for a cigarette butt, but only ?50 for dog faeces. I don't think anyone can argue that a cigarette butt is the easier of the two items to clean up, nor the lesser health and safety hazard.


As regards the comments about the free dog waste bags: as a practical solution, I suppose it works, to subsidise dog owners from the public purse in this way, if it will stop them from leaving the mess on the pavements which will be even more costly to clean up. The point is, though, that they should not be leaving the mess in the first place, and the same applies to anyone else whether they are dropping cigarette butts, broken glass, childrens' sweets wrappers or anything else.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> As regards the comments about the free dog waste

> bags: as a practical solution, I suppose it works,

> to subsidise dog owners from the public purse in

> this way, if it will stop them from leaving the

> mess on the pavements which will be even more

> costly to clean up. The point is, though, that

> they should not be leaving the mess in the first

> place, and the same applies to anyone else whether

> they are dropping cigarette butts, broken glass,

> childrens' sweets wrappers or anything else.



Quite right. The same applies to many things - we subsidise smokers when they're in hospital with lung cancer, and they shouldn't be smoking in the first place.

I've noticed a lot of small turds resembling dog mess around my road, As we keep seeing a family of four foxes in our garden and seem to be hearing a lot of foxes in the area I wondered if they could be to blame? Particularly as there are 3 small cubs who obviously have been recent additions to the population (plus I assume there are others), possibly hence the sudden spate in mess!
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...