Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But to answer the question, my answer is NO to independence. And most Scot's feel the same. The SNP have yet to have more than about a 35% of the population as a "Yes" in past public opinion polls. The best thing Cameron did was to force the SNP's hand with an earlier referendum than the SNP had planned. They have a long way to go to convince >50% of the population. Basically, it wont happen and this is a political side show that's wasting a load of time and money that could be spent by everyone on stuff that is likely to happen in the real world.

Add in Paxman and his "armoured train" loaded with 8% of the BofE gold reserve heading north etc. (actually add in the regular cliff faces of self-regard clashing as 'ec crosses swords with Paxo)


What's been, er, annoying about these "entertainments" is the exploitation of the cultural cringe factor, the playing on the sense that of course the poor old Scots couldn't handle the responsibilities of independence. Paxman and his eyebrows would make me want to vote yes (if I had a vote) just to stick it up that patrician disregard.


But overall, appeals to nationalism...too ugly, too late. Appeals to democratic accountability...yes of course. It all depends what you define as the relevant unit of population/nationhood, which I think is eventually a gut/heart decision.


Another thing. Say Labour does lose its block of Scottish MPs from Westminster, even as part of some sort of Devo Max arrangement. It looks like you then get a permanent English Tory majority, but given that possibility maybe we would see some re-balancing of party politics within England? Pipedream for a Friday lunchtime, obviously.

I thought Gordon sold of all the gold reserve :)


Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Add in Paxman and his "armoured train" loaded with

> 8% of the BofE gold reserve heading north etc.

> (actually add in the regular cliff faces of

> self-regard clashing as 'ec crosses swords with

> Paxo)

>

> What's been, er, annoying about these

> "entertainments" is the exploitation of the

> cultural cringe factor, the playing on the sense

> that of course the poor old Scots couldn't handle

> the responsibilities of independence. Paxman and

> his eyebrows would make me want to vote yes (if I

> had a vote) just to stick it up that patrician

> disregard.

>

> But overall, appeals to nationalism...too ugly,

> too late. Appeals to democratic

> accountability...yes of course. It all depends

> what you define as the relevant unit of

> population/nationhood, which I think is eventually

> a gut/heart decision.

>

> Another thing. Say Labour does lose its block of

> Scottish MPs from Westminster, even as part of

> some sort of Devo Max arrangement. It looks like

> you then get a permanent English Tory majority,

> but given that possibility maybe we would see some

> re-balancing of party politics within England?

> Pipedream for a Friday lunchtime, obviously.

yeah the attractions of SNP, nationalism and the rest of it sit uneasy with me, but so do the counter-arguments amounting to "Scotland wouldn't cope"


I'm sure same was said about Ireland in all the years before independance (and it's current economic woes hardly make it unique)

If the scots take the debts of the RBS (run almost exclusively by a Scottish banker mafia) and the Bank of Scotland debts of HBOS (and the Bank of Scotland was largely responsible for HBOS toxic corporate loan book that nearly sunk Lloyyds) then I'm all in favour; altenatively if the SNP and large numbers of other Scottish people could stop blaming London and 'The City' for all their woes and TAKE SOOME FOOKING RESPONSIBILITY they can stay.


Numbers, Mr Ben, Snorky and The BarryBarry boys can all stay on licence as I'm very fond of them all.

I don't understand this.


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>if the SNP and

> large numbers of other Scottish people could stop

> blaming London and 'The City' for all their woes

> and TAKE SOOME FOOKING RESPONSIBILITY they can

> stay.

>

>

That bit where the chap seemed to think that scotch types get spat on as they come off the train at padington/kings cross was a bit jarring wasn't it.

He might actually want to find out about English attitudes to the Scots before voting yay or nay on a ludicrous supposition of large scale racism.


That aside, of Galloway he is occasionally right even when his reasons for being right are wrong, stopped clock and all that. It is awful these days though, except when Will Self (who's often wrong even when his reasons for being wrong are right) or Ian Hislop are on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure how you define overtaxing, I expect most of the population would like to pay less tax.  One of the panel on Kuensseberg, not the young influencer, nor the unreconstructed old man (the opposite of 'new man') Piers Morgan), was fairly knowledgeable and explained that measures to improve growth such as an improved deal with the EU and trade agreements, are done elsewhere.  
    • Ryan Campbell from MS Heating and Plumbing is a lifesaver! I needed a new boiler installed urgently and I was struggling to find anyone with availability. Ryan juggled his jobs around and installed the boiler the next day. He has done a very professional job and came back a week later to flush the system and check everything was working properly including fixing a radiator that wasn’t warming up. Great communication and a lovely guy. His number is 07939 981908
    • Earl Aff-whatever-your-name-is (I'm dyslexic), you do realise that your 'liking' my earlier most, means that you indirectly agree with Rockets on something. Did hell just freeze over? 
    • The markets only react if they think there is risk. The fact that runaway inflation has caused enough of an increase in tax receipts to cover spending with a surplus means there is no increased risk.  The new tax rises can therefore be spent wholly on benefits without any increase in borrowing, again minimising risk to existing treasury bond lenders.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...