Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is there that many new users defending it? - I counted 2. Which is 2 too many (not to defend the shop. but too many IF they are connected) but not SO many


I can't see why if anyone is connected with the shop they don't just say so - you know "we've opened a shop, we have identified market x, it won't be to everyone's taste but come along and make your own mind up, no need to be so bitchy"


It's worked for G&B and Seacow...


Pretending to big up somewhere you are connected with is bad form and I normally moan about it - but in this case even if the "new people" are connected, it WAS after 4 or 5 pages of fairly vicious attacks - I have SOME sympathy with them. I still think they are better off engaging with potential audience

I live in croydon i have a shop on lordshiplane so i must be a classy italian chav then. Get it right all the chavs are in bromley not croydon.

Croydon has the drunks, troublemakers and trash who like to kill each other on a friday night and as i type i hear the familiar friday night police siren go on and on and on.

Back to topic, chavs would never be seen in a shop like davina because their benefits wouldnt stretch that far, they need money for icelands, pay the bills and the catalogue, so Davina is not a chav shop its a upmarket place that caters to certain tastes

irina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This shop looks tacky and dated already. Ugh!

> You

> > would have to be from Croydon to think it was

> > classy. Yuck.

>

> I have never seen so much SNOBERRY and

> PREJUDICE!!!I am digusted! I live in Croydon and

> for you and HonaloochieB to make such comments

> about Croydon you have to be both of these. To

> judge people for where they live and assume they

> are all the same is out of order. Just because

> some of you were "born with a silver spoon in your

> mouths" doesn't give you the right judge others

> that weren't.

>

> By the way before you judge me as well, my parents

> are educated, me and my husband are educated and

> both running our own businesses; but that doesn't

> mean I despise people less fortunate than me.

>

> And what is this gathering of snobbs throwing such

> nasty comments at your local shoe shop? I just

> can't understand it and feel sorry for that shop,

> well actually in all fairness no publicity is bad

> publicity.

>

> SHAME ON YOU!


Irina, calm down, you're talking like a shop girl. I bow to you and your family for breaking the Croydon mould and not only becoming educated yourself but having the good fortune, against all the odds to make a successful marriage. Well done!!

I'm pleased you have made a success in business, I'm assuming if it's Croydon based then it involves sports wear for people who wear it while actively avoiding any form of physical activity.

My I take issue with you about the accusation of snobbery? I have the smallest of staff possible for a gentleman. My valet is allowed to donate my cast-offs to his family, my cook is at liberty to carry home each tripe and entrail that I'm not encined towards, and as for the tweenie, I've made no advances upon her person. 'Pon my Sam.

Most of the time just so you know, the silver spoon isn't in my mouth, I tuck it rakishly behind my right ear.

Just pulling your leg!! The silver is in the safe keeping of my valet, Stebbings. And he knows to keep it safe, or else he and his family will be summarily dismissed with no reference and a stain on them that will follow them through society.

THEY SHALL RUE THE DAY THEY CROSSED ME! ! !


Nice to make your acquaintance Irina, I hope one day we may take tea together.

fuck me shoes for the SE22 masses.


I dnt see what the problem is with this shop - are people concerned it may attact the wrong sort of customer who may upset the calm of prosperous ED with their proley tart shoe wearing ways and bad language ?


Its an ostentatious bauble shop - not too dissimilar to 80 % of the other shops on LL


It must be an improvement from that heinous shop with its offensive MOR art that it's replaced surely ? At least you can wear shoes.( I have it on good authority that ist is possible to wear their range, albeit for short distances )


ho hum

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @#$%& me shoes for the SE22 masses.

>

> It must be an improvement from that heinous shop

> with its offensive MOR art that it's replaced

> surely ? At least you can wear shoes.( I have it

> on good authority that ist is possible to wear

> their range, albeit for short distances )

>

> ho hum


If it's 'middle of the road', can it be heinous and offensive?


You're going to say yes, aren't you?


Should'a seen that one coming.

Don't think these are proley tart shoes, some are around ?200 a pop, and Longchamp bags are decidedly not for the scummy mummy


And actually i'm going to eat humble pie. Having slgged it on the basis of the website, i decided to do the right thing and look inside the shop. There ARE some nasties in there, but i saw a couple of pairs that i really liked and am contemplating a purchase - i'd get the bag too, but is a bit pricey for me....

okay, perhaps I was a bit harsh yesterday. It is not shit and I think I was one of the first to defend the place when others were deriding it as being not right for round these parts oo aaar. I did get a bit wound up by the - okay not loads, 2 - new posters getting all uppity (still suspicious).

I did go in looking for a specific kind of thing and there was nothing in there that grabbed me particularly and most of the shoes do look a bit tacky IMO, I hate shoe shopping though. As I said earlier for ?200 I'd rather spend a wee bit more and get some Louboutins but chacun a son gout or summing like that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...