Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's fairly straightforward, so I'm not sure why so many question marks.


I'm wondering, Sue, how many people on this thread complaining about raw milk potentially killing us all routinely take unnecessary antibiotics, thereby hastening mankind's ultimate demise.

I don't think I've EVER been prescribed antibiotics for a cold, so I don't really get your point Rosie. In fact I don't think the doctor would even see you for something so trivial.


I've also no idea how drinking raw milk impacts the health of others, despite UncleBen's insightful (as always) explanation.


I'm not in the slightest bit interested in raw milk though. But then, as someone who only buys one pint of milk a week to pour onto the cereal on Sunday morning (and thinks organic veg boxes are a completely daft idea), I'm hardly the target market.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We all take precautions, DC - but if the glass

> coffee table should accidentally break if the

> wrong moment then there is a health risk.


That's why I take the extra precaution & wear a Pyrex dish *Bob*

What Jeremy said


I have no interest in raw milk (and was given the damn stuff enough as a child to know) but I can see why some people are interested


I have no idea why anyone else wants to stick their nose in. It's not as if the mainstream dairy industry is going to grind to a halt, causing the kind of problems woody talks about (food commodity markets)


Sourcing good quality fish and chips isn't helping with that either, but no-one barged into your F&C thread to talk about food commodity markets


sheesh

I've often heard doctors complain that it's easier just to give them the damn pills than persuade them of the pointlessness (and wider tragedy of the commons dangers) of the treatment.

Some people in not take no for an answer shock, or as sturgeon's law states "90% of everything is crap" or as piers' law states (who he?) "people are cunts".

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've often heard doctors complain that it's easier

> just to give them the damn pills than persuade

> them of the pointlessness (and wider tragedy of

> the commons dangers) of the treatment.


Sounds like that's the doctor's fault then...

In this country, probably, though some people really are hard to say no to, so it's a fault of education and it really is the fault of selfish arseholes who refuse to listen to reason.


In the wider world there is a huge culture of buying antibiotics in small quantities for every other sniffle.


I work with an Iranian lad who doesn't complete courses but takes them until he feels better and keeps them for later.

I gave him a very stern and snotty lecture sounding like someone's dad, but it's absolutely the norm in vast swathes of the planet and that's where all the multi-drug-resistant strains are originating and then going global.


So really rosie and I are pissing in the wind with this one.

I've had warm milk, straight from the udder, squirted all over me by the person milking the cow. Put me off milk for life it has.


Thought woody's tirade was more about the evils of capitalism than any concerns of a public health nature. However, who knows how much milk-gate affected brain development so my thinking here could be totally skewed.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have no idea why anyone else wants to stick

> their nose in.


Let me enlighten you.


This is the Lounge. It is the light-entertainment department of the forum, and it's the ideal place for silly games, pointless whinges and the sort of cries for help that brighten everyone else's misery.


It is not the Advertising Department. A post in this section is an invitation for discussion, and vituperative discussion is at least as good as any. If unhelpfully swarm-snaffling beekeepers, poet-exposing chancers from Peckham (or possibly Leeds or Suffolk or Cambridge - I've not tracked them down yet, mainly because they're more tedious than annoying), or even the proprietor of Woodrot's Special Clinic have to suffer as short a shrift as it amuses anyone to bother with, I see no good reason to make an exception for second-hand dairists from over the border.


I am only surprised that, so far, nobody's pointed out the rancid fatuity of advertising milk to people forty minutes off by bus in the height of summer. Especially if they can only be bothered to sell it once a week. But then, tastes differ, and it's not as if the self-selecting subset of the population who might be tempted to fall for the wheeze are in any sense undeserving, or will suffer much hardship by maxing out their Oyster cards on what, to normal people, would be part of a routine grocery trip. They might count as vulnerable, but the ethics of saving people from themselves has always been a little contentious, and such matters are best reserved for the philosophical sump of the forum, and that is not the Lounge.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello I have been with EE for years -10 ? - never had a single outage which is great when WFH. I had virgin before and it was terrible - so many outages - I live on Whateley Road - hope this is helpful 
    • This may be somewhat out of date but virtually no environmental benefit & almost entirely grass... really? https://www.gigl.org.uk/sinc/sobi09/ Description Peckham Rye was established as an open space in the late 19th century and includes several valuable habitat features spread across the park. The park is a Grade II Listed landscape, and has recently been restored with assistance from the Heritage Lottery Fund. A small community garden within the site is managed by the Friends of Peckham Rye. Peckham Rye Park won a Green Flag Award again for 2022. The site is used by the Southwark Health Walks project as part of a Walking the Way to Health (WHI) scheme. Wildlife This large park has several valuable habitat features. The most important of these is the only remaining above-ground section of the River Peck and the most natural stream in the borough. The stream is heavily shaded by native, unmanaged wet woodland dominated by alder, ash and pedunculated oak with a ground cover of pendulous sedge and bramble. Alder dominated woodland is a rare habitat in Southwark. Although somewhat altered with weirs, other artificial structures and ornamental planting, some sections are still in their natural banks and includes yellow flag, watercress, water figwort and cuckooflower. The largest of three ponds supports marginal vegetation including hemp agrimony. A variety of waterfowl nest on the wooded island, including tufted duck, coot, Canada goose and mallard. Substantial flocks of gulls visit the park in winter and bats are likely to forage over the water. Small blocks of predominantly native woodland, mostly on the boundary between the Park and the Common, are dominated by oak and ash with a well-developed understory, but sparse ground flora. Spring bulbs have been planted in previous years. These and several dense shrubberies support a good bird population and small numbers of pipistrelle bats are present. Infrequently mown grassland is located in one large area and was seeded in 2009. It's composition includes giant fescue, ladies bedstraw, meadowsweet, black knapweed and wild carrot. The rest of the park consists of amenity grassland with some fine mature trees.  
    • Same here. Incredibly selfish behaviour. Also illegal.
    • I heard them & our two dogs were extremely upset by it..  bad enough during the evenings but at least can have music on to dilute the noise!   Some people have literally zero thoughts for others!! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...