Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Went about three weeks ago after a long absence and had a great time. The fish was good, the chips too and the mushy peas were spot-on. The service was prompt and friendly, the wine was cool and totally acceptable, and the child portion was good value and enjoyed by the eight year old. It wasn't too busy and therefore not noisy. I'd go again.

Without denying the truth of anyone who had bad service/food At SC, I'm going to weigh in with a more positive take


To my undying shame I don't eat seafood so would normally give this place a miss, but the house and guests and pretty much everyone else does like seafood so I end up in here a bit, usually take out but ocassionally sit in and in all those times, not once has the food been off or the service mardy. The chips have been hit and miss over the years, with the misses not actually being bad but just a bit wooly compared to some others


By all means flag up the bad instances but there is a danger of painting a one-dimensional picture of a broken business here and it ain't


(as a non seafoodie I use the chipper next to ED Station with occassional visits to all the others mentioned)

people do bleat more often than praise though- I woud have been unlikely to have started a thread in support of the SC without prompting. maybe the woodrotettes have been unlucky getting hit with a couple of rotters in a few months. this aside, we gave it 10 years of use.

oh for sure woody - thought your OP and follow ups were sound, and then others gave theirs.


But usually there are a few counterbalances and this time there weren't, and then people started ripping Fay Maschler in the toasted thread for bigging up Sea Cow and it was started to look like an alternative reality. Good to see some more balance on there now


(you STILL confined to the Lounge btw?)

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> people do bleat more often than praise though- I

> woud have been unlikely to have started a thread

> in support of the SC without prompting. maybe the

> woodrotettes have been unlucky getting hit with a

> couple of rotters in a few months. this aside, we

> gave it 10 years of use.



I think the test should be how they would react if you did complain about the take away - it would be nice to think they would compensate you in some way and show you that they value your custom.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think the test should be how they would react if

> you did complain about the take away - it would be

> nice to think they would compensate you in some

> way and show you that they value your custom.


xxxxxx



I can't understand how a fish shop would not notice that they were cooking bad fish?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I think the test should be how they would react

> if

> > you did complain about the take away - it would

> be

> > nice to think they would compensate you in some

> > way and show you that they value your custom.

>

> xxxxxx

>

>

> I can't understand how a fish shop would not

> notice that they were cooking bad fish?


well they didn't have to eat it so maybe none the wiser. perhaps when they cooked it the rotten smell escaped them over the waft of oil/ammonia/vinegar etc


(On that ToastED thread, small wonder that locals who don't hold Sea Cow high in their estimation based on recent experience, took Fay Maschler's review of new place with a pinch of salt. Not that that would stop me from going to try it as I don't really go by what food critics say and I'd rather judge for myself. However, agree it was rather unfortunate that she'd somewhat tainted an otherwise good review by including praise for somewhere local that has, in many people's eyes, gone downhill)

to be fair, fish can turn very quickly, but you can feel the difference in raw fish as you handle it- hard to explain, but you can tell when its on the edge


This isnt a slagfest, I cant be arsed with that, more of a heads up for the owner to get on top of it - it doest seem to have affected anyone else, so maybe we woz just unlucky


pinhead refernce deleted


/ends

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it was rather unfortunate that she'd somewhat tainted an

> otherwise good review by including praise for

> somewhere local that has, in many people's eyes,

> gone downhill)


Seems an unfair criticism - can't really expect her to continually re-visit a restaurant to check that it hasn't slipped.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems an unfair criticism - can't really expect

> her to continually re-visit a restaurant to check

> that it hasn't slipped.


yeah fair point jeremy but really I'd not be keen to add it to any review unless I was pretty damn sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...