Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyone with half a brain knows that bringing up kids in your own little bubble is unhealthy both for them and society in general... regardless of political persuasion or what newspaper you may or may not read.


But is simply saying "I'm against ALL faith schools" sort of a PC way of wriggling out of the debate?

If you are in a little bubble you are hardly likely to perceive it as such and therefore couldn't possibly think it unhealthy.


I was taught in faith schools when growing up. It didn't stop me from thinking for myself in my teens and deciding I wasn't going to mass anymore, much to the horror of my mother.


My son was never christened but I bet there are plenty of non believers here who have had their little Jonny baptised, as you do. Hands up anyone?

There is still in place a requirement for prayer in state schools, presumably remaining from a time when the C of E featured predominantly in most British people's lives. In practice it seems most "secular" school ignore this, but technically my understanding is that it would be enforceable and schools could be penalised for not providing prayer time. So it seems that until we truly secularise all state schools, the argument against (any) religion in school is going to remain cloudy in practice.

I believe all primary schools should continue to do religious studies so that children learn to respect the various religions of their peers, but actual religious teachings / practises should have no place in school.


My daughter is starting a CofE school in September, and it worries me a bit.

A civilisation is measured not by the rights it grants its majority but the privileges it allows its minorities. Muslim families are as entitled as any other religious group to schools that nurture their children's faith. Muslim pupils should be educated in Muslim schools because the current system is marginalising them. Teaching Muslim children in a Muslim school would remove the "problem of them being exposed" to values that conflict with Islamic faith. Muslim pupils are disadvantaged and marginalised in the city's state schools because the cultural heritage of the curriculum is "European and Christian".


Muslim schools provide an education in accordance with the Muslim beliefs and values, such as providing single-sex schooling after puberty. They are thus a response to the danger of absorption into the dominant culture.


The number of Muslim children is on the increase in Bradford state and church schools. There are lot of schools where Muslim children are in majority. In my opinion, all such schools may be opted out as Muslim Academies for proper education. British history from early periods to present day should be taught in all schools. Islamic history from the early period to present day should be part and parcel of the National Curriculum. I think to be fair the Arabic and Persian contributions to the world in medicine, mathematics and other sciences plus their involvement in world affairs should be taught.


The demand for state funded Muslim schools is in accordance with the law of the land. Muslims are not asking for any favour. I set up the first Muslim school in London in 1981 and now there are 188 Muslim schools and only 12 are state funded. I would like to see each and every Muslim child in a state funded Muslim schools and I hope one day my dream would come true. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. Bilingual Muslim children need bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental period. There are few schools for Hindu and Sikh communities. Now even Black community is thinking of setting up their own state funded schools for their own children with black teachers.


You better teach your children in your own schools and let migrant communities teach their children according to their needs and demands.British Establishment and society should concentrate on the evils of their own society and stop trying to change the way of life of Muslims. Muslim community does not want to integrate with the British society, indulging in incivility, anti-social behaviour, drug and knife culture, binge drinking, teenage pregnancies and abortion.


A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit. He/she is well versed in standard English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages so that they do not find themselves cut off from their cultural heritage and are able to enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry.

IA

What's the difference between a dead Muslim and a dead Christian? Nothing. So if you define your life along the lines of what differences there are between people or religions as opposed to what you have in common, you are suffering from a form of self entrapment. It's a form of blindness.

Iftikhar Ahmed,


First thing, do you have any children? If the miracle has occurred and you do so, how many of them have you sent to a Muslim School?

Secondly, under what authority you have appointed yourself the spokesperson of Muslims in Dulwich/London?


If you want Muslim Schools there are plenty in Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh,India, Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan. As a British Muslim living happily in Dulwich, having gone to a C of E School myself, I'm finding it extremely difficult to understand what you're trying to prove. I did not lose any of my Islamic beliefs and I was not cut off of my cultural heritage and I am bilingual! I can tell you that many of my friends and I in similar positions have gained a lot by attending the government schools in this country. With your views I can only feel pity for your children.

Please be brave enough to answer the question I mentioned first.

In Dulwich we have people of all religious beliefs and those without living peacefully and the last thing we need is a person of your kind trying to cause havoc in the minds of people in the name of Islam. Having read your post many times over I can only come to one conclusion that is I SMELL A RAT.

We do not need another self appointed hypocrite as a 'spokesperson' for Muslims in Dulwich.


Look forward to hearing from you Brother.

Come on everyone leave Ifti alone, is there any amongst us who haven't got pissed-up and made a post filled with streams of ludicrous, high-falutin' garbage dressed up as a 'serious' starting off point for debate?

You know, got all in a lager and Jack D fuelled mood that after much brooding gave you the confidence, that well, you could be a contrarian. Mild-mannered as you are.

You change from Christopher Robin to Christopher Hitchens


And then in the hot, aching, shuddering grip of a hangover, you read your post and the responses to it.

Shame, guilt, nausea etc overwhelm.


But, probably still under the influence you decide to grit your teeth and continue to defend your indefensible position.


Seen it on here with restaurants, songs, pubs, pizzas and more, so let's let Ifti off the hook and just discreetly let this thread drop and ignore any attempts by him to revive it.

The debate rages on Jeremy- 'faith' schools promote 'faith' in a supernatural 'being' (which is a massive copout in itself since there is and never will be any empirical evidence for said being) and all the hype and discrimination that goes with it. And- unfortunately Alan Medic- some faiths discourage thinking for oneself i.e. they require 'blind faith'

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But, AC maybe they was as royally slaughtered on

> Stella and gin, when they started up with one

> another as Ifti was on Kronenbourg and Jack.

> It's an explanation, of sorts I guess.

>

> But heck, them boys do like to quarrel. That's for

> sure.


Arhhhh

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow, well served with local supermarkets then…  Agree with ATM.. good c position to been mugged or cloned card - prob why not been considered before. Wasn’t there one outside post office and still  is2where people were abit nervous of using? Hope I am wrong but won’t see me rushing to use it…sure lots of folk will benefit thou. Not a great fan or user of Iceland but when it closed years ago people complained..  Guess they only b look at bigger sites - can’t recall an express one but a pity to those who frequent the store. Strange that Tesco can use it as local but Iceland can’t - guess it is  power of large supermarkets. Personally would have  loved an Aldi or Lidl but  clearly site to small. Only grocery stores left to come are Waitrose, Aldi, Lidl… 
    • I'm paying £31 pcm for full fibre 300, whatever that is. I'm not sure it's a particularly good deal now, but I did a comparison at the time I went onto it, and it was then. I don't have a landline any more, and my mobile is with iD, who piggyback off 3. I don't usually have any problems,  except once a few years back when the whole 3  network (?) went  down for quite a long time.
    • I have Plusnet too.   I recently (August) had some problems with WiFi connection on different days but and the turning off and turning on didn’t work.  The WiFi didn’t work for quite a few hours - overnight in one case but eventually rectified itself.   Would be interested to know how much other people pay for Plusnet. I also have a landline with them as the mobile signal is bad inside house.  That is with EE and I want to change from them to another provider.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...