Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah I guess UB has made his bed to a certain extent, as he clearly has a rather 'confrontational' forum persona.


Clearly the joke CAN be (presumably) misinterpreted, as about 50% of the posters here have demonstrated. But I'm still struggling to see why, out of the many meanings you could infer, so many people automatically jump to the worst case scenario.

On the vague subject of Indian restaurant staff, I was mildly surprised to learn that Dita at Tandoori Nights has transferred to the Fulham branch


She was outside LL last week and I mentioned I hadn't seen her for a while (mostly because I haven't been there for a long time) when she said. Feels like end of an era...

'I do not need to pigeon hole people to form an opinion'


Oh really UncleBen? Most of your attacks on various people on this forum do exactly just that!!!! You are the worst person for it! Not only that, you clearly have been around way longer than the registered start date of you current alias. That in itself says something.


SJ is spot on in his reasoning imo.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On the vague subject of Indian restaurant staff, I

> was mildly surprised to learn that Dita at

> Tandoori Nights has transferred to the Fulham

> branch

>

> She was outside LL last week and I mentioned I

> hadn't seen her for a while (mostly because I

> haven't been there for a long time) when she said.

> Feels like end of an era...


She's been "promoted", in the words of the owner.

I was asked why I was offended and I explained why. If you don't agree with me fair enough.


I judged his post on past posts and I would bet anyone ?50 he is a 'working class' white male in his 50-60's.


I evaluated in the context of the contents of his posts and from this conclude he is probably in that demographic. The unpleasant views he espouses fit with a certain section of that demographic.


If I'm wrong, shoot me.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How that other thread going, fl0wer..? The one

> where we all try to live together in peace and

> harmony?

>

> QED


No *Bob*, that was not what it was about. The topic I posted, if you would do me the favour of reading it, was about reducing unnecessary aggression by each person identifying honestly their own need.


In the context of the forum it often looks as though the only requirement for some people is to bait others and create maximum spotlight on their 'naughtiness' = tactic of severely neglected children. Also it's a truism, but bullied children soon grow to be bullies themselves, this is as old as Time & zoologists observe it in troupes of primates & call it 'bicycling', because the subordinated creature then goes off and scrabbles over something else, weaker & smaller than itself.


Given how humans are in such a mess, facilities of online communication offer 1,000 ways for aggression to get worse or better.

But 3 things a computer won't ever do on its own,

1) substitute for real friends,

2) do the work of self-awareness or

3) make societies break the default position of bullying happening whilst kindly people are absent.

Most people come on here as a diversion from everyday life*, not to make themselves a better person. Threads with extended repeat viewings are almost always the ones with childish scrapping and confrontation. Like this one.


It's the same reason why people watch Eastenders.





*or find a plumber

I don't think it's a breakdown in communication. It's about whether a statement which has several possible connotations - one of which is offensive - is OK.


Some people think it's not OK to leave yourself open to interpretation in that way. Others don't see a problem. I'm fine with either of those opinions. But a couple of people are effectively saying "I think you meant that, therefore you're racist"... which just doesn't make sense.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Most people come on here as a diversion from

> everyday life*, not to make themselves a better

> person.



Exactly. Although some fund their online persona a great reassurance and something to cling to.

Well is it OK then, to use the EDF and a question about a tandoori restaurant, for unleashing the 'online troublemaker' or 'jungle bully' persona?


What's the motivation for constant return to it here?


Why not keep it for a less multicultural forum, eg private writings, or own blog / facebook?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But is it the Village councillors who are maintaining the board, or someone else? When the boards in East Dulwich were installed, it wasn't the councillors who kept the information up to date, it was Monica from Health Matters, who was greatly involved in various  community matters (eg the building of the community garden at what was then Dulwich Hospital). I can't remember if it was her who initiated the installation of the boards in the first place. She no longer lives in East Dulwich, and nobody else appears to be willing to liaise with the councillors and community related organisations  to take this on for the various East Dulwich boards.  It would hardly take much effort. Basic information doesn't frequently change (and no, I'm not volunteering. I am overstretched as it is). It's all very well to  get a physical  community notice board spruced up, but not much use if it then isn't being used for its intended purpose. And I can't see that it is part of a councillor's job to update notice boards which they didn't initiate in the first place. I'm sure they have more than enough to do.  The notice boards serve (or did do) a useful service, but all the information which could be put on them is surely available elsewhere. (Unless it is bringing to people's attention things which are of use/interest to them and they weren't aware they needed/would like, or didn't know how else to find the information). ETA: Oh. I've just read the beginning of this thread. I'd forgotten how it started. It's gone well off topic, hasn't it. Probably just as well, reading the OP.
    • The board in the Village (just near the pub) is in pristine condition, full of council-related information (though someone had stuck a flyer on the glass, now removed). Maybe the councillors there actually CBA to make use of a facility that took time, effort and taxpayers’ money to instal?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...