Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bawdy-nan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> its a lovely place to sit outside and while

> away a morning.


Ahh, a voice of infinite reason! Where's the rush, people? If it were in France, you'd love it and say it has charm.. 'Fickle' is one word extremely apt for the residents of ED!

Fuschia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hah. I just this minute received an email, dated

> 30th May but hitherto lost in the ether, I

> presume, apologising for what happened!

>

> I eat my words!


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Why is it always the emails (and mobile messages) guaranteed to cause most inconvenience/embarrassment if you don't receive them which go into some black hole for several days between the sender and recipient?


And where do they go ?!?!?!

> Where's the rush,

> people? If it were in France, you'd love it and

> say it has charm.. 'Fickle' is one word extremely

> apt for the residents of ED!


Ahh, but if I were in France, I'd be on holiday... and therefore wouldn't mind the wait so much! I don't think there's anything fickle about not wanting to wait 40 mins or whatever for your lunch.


It would be nice if the owners could come on the forum and tell us what they're doing to improve the service. Surely it's also in their interests to turn the tables over a bit more quickly?

McDonald's in Peckham's reliably quick!!


Agreed though it'd be nice if BMC came on the forum to have a word, like Kate from G&B did when they received a lot of flak. It's good publicity and won G&B a few fans; so much better than having a go at the Admin* behind the scenes or telling customers what miseries they were like another proprietor did once.


* capitalised for he is the local deity

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The BMC has always had rubbish service

>

> Some pople like the "charm" of it, I just go

> elsewhere


it is one of those overrated places that I just dont get


and the tiles on the pation are a menace when theyre wet - surprised theres not been a no win/ no fee claim against them yet.


actually its wet today ...Im off to the BMC then onto casualty at Kings

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


so much better than having

> a go at the Admin* behind the scenes or telling

> customers what miseries they were like another

> proprietor did once.

>


Mockney, can you point me to the post that states the owners approached the admin behind the scenes? I cannot find a reference to it.

eccentric Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mockney piers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> so much better than having

> > a go at the Admin* behind the scenes or telling

> > customers what miseries they were like another

> > proprietor did once.

> >

>

> Mockney, can you point me to the post that states

> the owners approached the admin behind the scenes?

> I cannot find a reference to it.

I've been going to the Blue Mountain cafe for quite some time and have generally found it to be great. I like the ambience and the staff. Must admit that I generally go for quiet times when I can be assured there will be little trouble getting a table or being served. And I usually go for coffee and cakes rather than cooked food. Having young kids myself I can sympathise with Fuschia and her sense of being disappointed when she took a precious moment for a quick treat.

But taking this to the general, I have seen some pretty rude behaviour from patrons in there. Some take that haughty "I am the customer and you must serve me" approach and it rather bugs me. If I was the waiter, or the proprietor I'd be inclined to go slow on the rude punter on table 4. The BMC seems a very successful cafe and can probably afford to lose a few customers. Perhaps its their way of flushing out the more demanding ones.

citizenED Wrote: I have seen some

> pretty rude behaviour from patrons in there. Some

> take that haughty "I am the customer and you must

> serve me" approach and it rather bugs me. If I was

> the waiter, or the proprietor I'd be inclined to

> go slow on the rude punter on table 4. The BMC

> seems a very successful cafe and can probably

> afford to lose a few customers. Perhaps its their

> way of flushing out the more demanding ones.



I can assure you we weren't at all rude, certainly not when we went in and ordered, and not even when we left before our food arrived!

Tazzi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Citizen i could not have put it better myself,

> some residents of ED think they can be rude to

> staff, i have seen it myself and its really unfair

> to be spoken to rudely. I can think of a couple on

> this forum.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


I don't think there has ever been any suggestion that Fuchsia had to wait half an hour to be served because she was rude to BMC staff??


:-S


Edited to say: Sorry posted at same time as Fuchsia :-$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...